In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool contributors Travis Hoium, Tyler Crowe, and Rachel Warren discuss:

• CoreWeave's results.
• Neocloud financing.
• Cava's traffic growth.
• Why restaurants are hard.
• Inflation eases.
• Energy's impact on prices.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This podcast was recorded on Aug. 12, 2026.

Travis Hoium: Neoclouds are flying high, and Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts right now. Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoium I'm joined today by Tyler Crowe and Rachel Warren. And, guys, the big topic of the day is the neoclouds, two of the biggest companies in that space, CoreWeave and Nebius, reported earnings in the last 24 hours, and both their stocks are flying high. They're up about 20% in early trading on Wednesday. Rachel, what did you take away from this? The numbers were pretty solid, but I don't think that was a surprise for anybody who listened to the hyperscalers, the bigger tech companies saying, Hey, we need more computing, and we're willing to pay.

Rachel Warren: These are earnings that are really capturing the neocloud paradox that we're seeing. There's massive top-line growth, but we're seeing really heavy infrastructure spending that's weighing down the bottom line. So CoreWeave revenue was up 112% year over year. They're operating at a net loss. But demand is there. They're holding about $104 billion revenue backlog. That's actually excluding an extra $25 billion that CoreWeave secured early in Q3. That's anchored by deals like their ongoing deal with Meta. But CoreWeave paid about $640 million in quarterly net interest expenses on its debt pile in this three-month period just ended. They actually raised their full-year capex expenditure outlook up to almost 40 billion on the top end.

Then going over to Nebius, we're seeing more of the same. Their revenue was up, I think it was 454% year over year. They're saying that 70% of their deals, Nebius and Q2 included upfront customer prepayments. So the neocloud business model is somewhat evolving from this multi-month model training to higher margin usage-based inference workloads. Another thing that also stuck out. CoreWeave said they're signing Nvidia for 100 contracts extending out into 2029. That's ensuring that a 2020 generation ship can generate returns nearly a decade after launch. Bottom line, for me that I'm seeing, customers aren't just paying for the chip generation. They're paying a premium for the active cooled, fully powered data center capacity, and this isn't a time where power grids are severely constrained. You've got companies like Nebius that are experimenting with deploying AI cloud software directly in their clients own data centers. This could be really key to their growth long term. Some of the funding mechanisms behind the data center build-outs, which I'm sure we'll talk about in a bit, I still find a bit concerning.

Travis Hoium: Tyler, that's the interesting thing here. I will note that CoreWeave's 9% 2031 debt was trading over 12% yield just a few weeks ago. That is down to just under 11%, but that's a really high interest rate when you have capital needs. That means you're either going to be selling stock or you're going to be selling debt for the foreseeable future at this point. Sustainable is this? Because the thing that I always keep going back to is, in particular, Alphabet's comment about we're signing a bunch of these short term deals, and these were seen as I think Nebius was really proud of these short term deals because they're very high margin, but we're signing these short term deals as a bridge to when they get their full data centers, this $200 billion that they're spending on capex up and running. I don’t think Alphabet, or Meta, or any of these companies is saying, Hey, these neoclouds are the long-term solution, but it’s a short-term solution. How do you think about that as an investor?

Tyler Crowe: It's hard to square. Part of it says, take the advantage when you can. If the market's telling you to sell short, sell short. It does sound a little bit like commodity trading, where it’s like, if you have short-term demand, sell it on short, and if it’s looking pretty weak, sell in long-term demand. It's basically like a hedging schedule for a oil company, basically, like we're talking about here. On the financing side only 11%. It's pretty high interest rates, not exactly the most assuring thing.

One of the other things that I found interesting in some of the deals that we were talking about here, too was not only are we talking about unsecured loans like at 11% range. We're also talking about now they're looking at asset-backed, basically compute-backed loans, which are trading for what is it? The overnight SOFR rate plus 2.5%? That is technically like junk territory for a lot of bonds. That's the two things. The equity market loves this stuff. You can see from the results in the stock market reactions that we're seeing for these companies, the stock run ups that we've seen recently, equity just can't seem to get enough of this good news. But the debt markets are like, man, you got to pay up for this because some of the cash flows don't seem nearly assured as equity seems to be hopeful about, equity investors. We're always hopeful, folks.

Travis Hoium: I do find that striking, and typically the way that it works in markets is equity investors are thinking about upside. Debt investors are thinking about the downside. As an equity investor, one of the reasons that I like to look at those debt markets is what are those debt investors thinking about from a downside perspective? Rachel, one of the things that Tyler mentioned was taking the short term win and the long term win from Nebius, they said that their third Q3 short term capacity deals were over $40 million per megawatt. That is almost quadruple of $12 million from their 2026 base, and their Q2 deals were over $20 million a megawatt. Now, those are short-term capacity deals, so doesn't the challenge here become not what is Q3 going to look like or what is Q4 going to look like, but what does 2029, 2030 look like? Because that's when these trillions of dollars of investment that all these hyperscalers are putting on, is that really going to come on?

Rachel Warren: I think that's the hope. The demand is certainly there. I think, if anything, the bottlenecks are how much construction can keep up with the demand that a lot of these hyperscalers need and are seeing. I mentioned a little bit about the funding mechanism for some of this earlier. We're seeing this turn into a megatrend. You've got the likes of Nvidia. For example, they're partnering with the institutional Titans like BlackRock, KKR, Apollo to unlock hundreds of billions of dollars in third-party capital to build data centers. I think there's this push to legitimize AI infrastructure as its own maybe something like an institutional asset class. That really feeds into whether or not we continue to see this capacity go online.

I think when you look at stocks like CoreWeave, you look at stocks like Nebius Group, these are businesses that are responding to real demand and a true build-out that I think will be a multi-year one. But I think if you look at the valuations for these companies, I don't think it's reasonable, given if you look at their bottom line, which in some cases is nonexistent, the hoped-for cash flows, margins, these are the areas that concern me looking ahead. Obviously, the revenue is important, the revenue backlogs are solid. But I would be very careful approaching investments in these businesses without understanding where some of these underlying funding mechanisms come into play for their business models.

Travis Hoium: Tyler, I just wanted to bring up, though, we've seen some of these things before in our history, not too long ago, with solar and wind, with these interesting asset classes that we're creating. Rachel was talking about the Nvidia actually coming in and being a backstop, which always makes me a little bit nervous. If this is such a great asset class, why can't you get plenty of financing? Why is it starting to be junk debt or close to junk debt? The other thing is, I keep thinking that a lot of this token creation is very commodity-like, and then I keep seeing earnings with investors saying, this proves that it's not a commodity. But when demand exceeds supply for a commodity, the price goes up. We just talked about those short-term deals. Doesn't this look exactly like a commodity? There's so many hallmarks of things we've seen before.

Tyler Crowe: It's pretty much a commodity, but sometimes that's not necessarily a bad thing. You were giving the example of the solar industry, where we did see a lot of future cash flow loans or tax credit loans that didn't end up turning out too well. But I will give a counter of where it did work. We saw in LNG export companies in the United States, where they basically took those long-term sales contracts, even though they didn't have a project built, and they're like, Hey, we've got 30-year sign-ups on sales. You want to give us some debt, and it worked out in the long run, and it did end up being the financing model for them. Most of the time, creative financing never works out. But I don't know, what is it? Sixty percent of the time, it works every time, I guess is the best way to put it.

On the commodity side, as well, it does feel like it’s going to go through these short-term shortages where you’re going to get higher pricing, long-term sign-ups. I don't know, maybe they need to bring in some commodity traders into their pricing desks to do a lot of this because it would make sense for a Nebius or Core, I don't know. I'm just throwing out some rough numbers here, but, like, 60-70% of our capacity is sold on long-term contracts. Then another 15 is on medium contracts, and then we’ll leave, like 10-15 on these short-term contracts, so we can capture some of that upside when everybody is desperate for demand. I know it's probably not a parlance a lot of people in tech have thought about before, but it does really echo a lot of the things we've been talking about in commodities and energy over the long period.

Travis Hoium: When we come back, we are going to get to what's happening in the food business. More on that in a moment.

ADVERTISEMENT You just found out that your sales team is at risk of missing quota. Don't panic, just ask Rippling AI. Since it’s built on your real-time people and business data, Rippling AI can pull metrics from Rippling and Salesforce into a meeting-ready dashboard showing quota attainment, headcount plan, and monthly revenue to quota by region. In seconds, you'll see exactly what's behind your quota risk and fix it before it's missed. Question answered. Action taken, crisis averted. When you have critical business questions that need answers, don't just file a ticket and wait weeks for an outdated report. Describe what you need and have Rippling AI build it instantly from your live people and business data, whether it's a dashboard with detailed charts or automated workflows with the right triggers, conditions, and approvals. Ready to rule your business, head to rippling.ai/fool to get the only AI built to give you full visibility and take complex actions across your entire organization. That's R-I-P-P-L-I-N-G-.-A-I-/-F-O-O-L. Sign up for exclusive access today rippling.ai/fool.

ADVERTISEMENT: Sleep Number's new collections are designed to adapt to the changing nature of your life and your sleep needs, whether it's the personalized comfort of the comfort mode mattress, the targeted pressure relief of the comfort next mattress or the climate collection that actively cools or warms to help you fall asleep and stay asleep. Now, get early access to our biggest sale of the save 25% on the new ComfortNext Lux for a limited time only at a Sleep Number store or sleepnumber.com.

Travis Hoium: Rachel, one of the big earnings reports in the last 24 hours, too, was Cava, this restaurant that I keep hearing about, but we still don't have here in the Midwest. I really have a hard time investing in restaurants until I can actually go eat at them. Maybe I need to make a trip down to Lou’s area, where he says he loves his Cava. But this was one of the really positive earnings reports, and we've seen some pretty negative reports from a lot of these restaurants, higher commodity costs are hitting certain companies, less spending. We'll talk about inflation in just a moment. But those pressures don't seem to be hitting Cava right now.

Rachel Warren: Yeah, and it's interesting, looking at Cava's results, I think it's less of a commentary on the consumer and more about how the strategy they're deploying is working in today's environment. They had 9% same store sales growth. Most of that was traffic-driven. Traffic was up more than 5% year over year pricing, product mix changes. That only accounted for about 3.7% of that growth. We're in an environment where rivals are forcing price hikes. There dealing with empty dining areas in some cases. But Cava seems to be winning really on transaction volume, and we saw their revenue skyrocket, even as a lot of the fast-casual restaurants are really struggling.

What was interesting was management on their earnings call, said that a lot of their lower-income customer tiers are actually generating the highest same-restaurant sales results. And this is at a time where you've got a lot of the competing, say, fast food giants, fast casual, whatever you want to categorize, that are discounting, trying to retain that customer traffic. Cava is absorbing that demographic organically, and instead of hiking prices to match inflation, they've actually minimized any type of price increases, which has been notable. They opened 17 net new restaurants during the quarter. Now they have just under 500 locations across, I believe it's 29 states. Their average unit volume has hit three million. I hate to mention it, but we've got the recent Cyclospora outbreak. That has impacted competitors like Sweetgreen significantly. There was a bit of a dip in July, Cava's CFO said, but they said same-store sales have already bounced back. There's really, I think, a strong, loyal customer base there. One final thing that also stuck out to me. We've seen some of these fast-casual restaurants deploying automation. There's been concerns about what that would mean for the workforce, but they're really shifting employee focus away from chopping ingredients, but more towards customer service, digital order fulfillment. They have zero long-term debt, really healthy cash stockpile. It's a well-run business, and I think at least today, the stock seems to be actually responding in that growth story.

Travis Hoium: Tyler, how do you think about that growth in that the pricing when it comes to restaurants because there's a ton of operating leverage in a restaurant, if you're not aware? The actual food only costs about 30% of what your bill is at a restaurant. Keeping prices relatively steady can be fine if you are getting more traffic, but there's always a balance between what are you going to do with prices? How's it going to impact margins and your traffic at the business?

Tyler Crowe: I was reading between the lines a little bit, and as Rachel mentioned, CompStore, the one thing I did notice was there was a little bit of margin compression over the past couple of years. They said they didn't push price, but it did seem like the mix of products that they were selling tend to be a little bit higher price, ever so slightly lower margin. Probably some of the seafood options, something like that, where your gross margins just obviously aren't as high. Gross margins on proteins are always lower relative to what else you ever have in the restaurant. I think overall, it was pretty good. To be frank, though, it's got to be one of the hardest businesses. The numbers this time around looked really good. But guidance actually was trending ever so slightly lower. They were saying margins might come in a little bit weaker, but Comp M's estimates are supposed to grow a little bit. So again, it kind of trends towards that what they're selling mix getting a little bit better.

This is a really hard industry in general. It's hard for me to invest in as an investor. I actually love restaurants. I used to work in restaurants. The thrill of working in that house in front of the house. It is stressful but fun in its own way. But actually being an investor on it, God, almost would be taking Alka-Seltzer all the time, because it's hard to track, what is trendy, what isn't, and often it can defy expectations. We're talking about Cava one of the new trendy restaurants that's been growing like crazy, and then just the same day Brinker International reported their earnings. It looked like it was on a slow decline from the 2010 all the way to 2023. Then voila, everyone loves Chili's again and the company's posting 5.6% comps, 11% year over year of [inaudible] and raising guidance. Who saw that on their bingo card?

Travis Hoium: This has been a really hard one. Shares of Cava are about flat since the early part of 2024 and are actually down more than 50% from their high, which was hit late in 2024. They can go on these rocket ship runs, and then those can end really quickly. Next up, we are going to talk about what's going on in inflation. We'll be back in a moment. We can't get out of here without touching on inflation. We got a big inflation report earlier this morning. Reading for July, Tyler, 3.4%, slightly below some of the expectations met some of the expectations I saw. But nothing really surprising. This is theoretically takes some of the pressure off the Fed to raise rates more this year. But the thing that stuck out to me is that at least in the month of July, energy prices were down, and that's probably going to reverse to increased energy prices in August. So there's a lot of push and pull here.

Tyler Crowe: This push and pull has gotten pretty wild whiplash in this, you know, labor market inflation, either be CPI or purchase or price index. Last time I was on with you two was back in April. We were talking about this as well, which apparently, Lou only goes on vacation the weeks when inflation data comes out in mind.

Travis Hoium: He doesn't want to hear it.

Rachel Warren: He leaves it for us.

Tyler Crowe: He wants to skip these conversations altogether. It's hard to have a strong case one way or the other. Looking at these few months ago, job growth was fine. We were worried about high inflation. Oh, maybe they're going to start to raise rates. We looked pretty close this time around, but now we're looking at it, and it's like, inflation's cooling. Job markets are starting to weaken a little bit. To your point, energy is going to go higher, likely, because we were just talking about the most recent update from the ongoing conflict with Iran seems to be, we're just going to key do it. Whatever that means, but that tends to be closures of the Strait of Hormuz, which means higher oil prices.

Travis Hoium: Not to mention all the demand from AI data centers, which increases electricity costs, that is a big piece of the energy picture right now, too.

Tyler Crowe: My best guess that I can give. Again, one thing that inflation data does better than anything else is make talking heads like us look ridiculous like six weeks later. That's actually might be its job more than anything else. My best guess is that we were looking like we were going to see an interest rate hike in September. There was a lot of pressure from not necessarily the Fed chair, but everyone else, very unsettled by it, but maybe weaker job growth, maybe slightly cooler expectations on inflation. That might drive it. But like I said, last time we did this, I said, the PPI numbers were going to come out the next day, and those could be even bigger. I can say the same thing because we've been talking about all this AI infrastructure growth, and that has been the big driver of production inflation. Is companies like Meta, Alphabet, all these other guys just spending all they want all the time and not even caring when inflation goes higher?

Rachel Warren: The 3.4% print for July down a fraction from June's 3.5%, very heavily detached from the Fed's long term 2% price stability target. The other thing to note, energy prices are also masking the real economic reality right now. Energy did experience a temporary drop in July. We saw gasoline down 2.2%, but this was very much due to these temporary stop-and-start peace negotiations in the Middle East. Those talks have collapsed. Perhaps they will restart, but August is already tracking to import a massive energy shock back into headline inflation. If you look past food and gas, core inflation ticked up 0.2% for the month. That leaves the annual core rate around 2.5%, and this is being very aggressively sticky because you've got secondary pressures like airline fares, for example, the jump 2.2% healthcare also up. It's offsetting a lot of the localized relief in retail commodities.

Another thing to note here businesses have been, for a while now, passing on tariff-related costs to consumers. You're seeing visible month-over-month price spikes for a lot of core household items. Annualized inflation at 3.4% means that prices are outstripping wage growth, which is pacing right now around 3.2%. We saw average real hourly earnings slip by 0.2% year over year. What does this mean? This means that consumers’ purchasing power is actively eroding. And we also just saw, you know, the report last week showing the economy shed 23,000 jobs in July. The Central Bank has it. Some difficult decisions coming up, but they need to keep rates restrictive with this sticky inflation rate, but doing so risks fracturing what is still a turbulent labor market. It is not a clear-cut answer at this point, and I'm sure we'll have more discussions about this in future episodes.

Travis Hoium: Definitely something to keep an eye on, the Fed is definitely one of the things that is driving the market short term. Not necessarily something we want to be too focused on as long-term investors, but something of note, especially when inflation is higher for longer than maybe a lot of people expect it.

As always, people in the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about in The Motley Fool, or may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows The Motley Fool’s editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For Tyler Crowe, Rachel Warren, and Kristi Waterworth behind the glass, I'm Travis Hoium. We'll see you here tomorrow.