NAV growth remained essentially flat year over year. But the dividend was boosted considerably to $0.40 per share, plus an additional $0.10-per-share special dividend, versus $0.34 per share a year earlier.
Often, BDCs will issue a special dividend at year's end if their taxable income exceeds their dividend income in a given year. These are usually due to realized gains from portfolio investments, and they generally can't be counted on to reoccur year after year. BDCs will also typically carry over some excess taxable income (subject to a 4% tax) from year to year to maintain further dividend stability for the next year.
Among other sticking points, BDC investors often have trouble determining fair valuations for their investments. Currently, fair value is determined by the board of directors and frequently confirmed by independent valuation consultants. However, I've seen many analysts throw their hands up in the air when attempting to value BDCs, mainly because the businesses offer too little information to reverse-engineer the numbers and determine what type of returns can be expected from the investment.
In my opinion, these analysts are focusing on the wrong numbers. Many of the BDC players provide an incredible amount of information about their companies in all other aspects, making for fascinating 10-K and 10-Q reading. The lack of information on fair valuations, and comparable private valuations, means that Foolish investors shouldn't try to reverse-engineer "black-box" type valuations but instead focus on less conventional metrics.
Investors can get a better idea of the company's worth by checking out management's investment prowess, as seen in the company's portfolio return information. Foolish investors can also determine management's expertise through each company's net losses, not to mention the grading system that BDCs employ. The prospects for growth in the NAV and dividend can be evaluated by the relative age and seasoning of a portfolio of investments, since it takes several years for the value in most such investments to be realized, and by the level and focus of the BDC's investment activity.
There's one big challenge looming for Ares and other BDCs aiming for $1 billion-plus portfolios. The company may face more competition for funding from commercial and investment banks like JPMorgan Chase
For more BDC coverage at the Fool:
Fool contributor Stephen Ellis does not own shares in any companies mentioned. You can view the stocks he owns and check out his 99th-percentile ranking in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's new stock-rating community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.