President Barack Obama's got people talking with his nomination for deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.
The new FDA commissioner's deputy, Joshua Sharfstein, is a pretty well-respected guy. With two capable people at the helm, that's got people talking about the possibility of splitting the food safety portion away from the drug portion of the agency. Taking the F out of the FDA would certainly be advantageous for investors in drug and medical device companies -- who needs a chief distracted by tainted peanut butter -- but the big question is whether we'll be left with a DA that's deserving of a D or an A grade.
As an investor, the FDA currently gets a failing grade in my book. Sure it's not completely the agency's fault. In the wake of post-approval safety issues with Merck's
I've lost track of the number of drugmakers that have been subject to agency delays. From giant Johnson & Johnson
Removing the food section from the drug section would eliminate one distraction, but the safety issues aren't going to go away anytime soon. It might raise the agency up to a D grade, but until the government throws some serious cash at the agency, it seems unlikely that the speed of approvals is going to pick up anytime soon.
More Foolish commentary:
GlaxoSmithKline and Johnson & Johnson are Income Investor recommendations. To see how dividend-paying stocks can offer both secure income and the opportunity for growth, take a free look at this newsletter with a 30-day free trial.
More from The Motley Fool
Why Zillow Group Inc. Stock Jumped 11.8% in 2017
The online real estate leader just finished a fantastic year, but the stock certainly didn't always reflect as much.
No Visible Path to Growth for GoPro and Its Investors
After stumbling during the holiday season, the company unveils yet another turnaround plan -- is it too late?
Why Fossil Group, Inc. Stock Plummeted 70% in 2017
Strong wearable technology sales couldn't save the lifestyle accessories leader from big losses last year.