Wireless Facilities, which competes with the likes of LCC International
The likely culprit is the Street's 2004 EPS estimates, which were reduced by a penny or two due to a higher-than-anticipated "effective tax rate" for the coming year. Wireless Facilities gets about a quarter of its revenue from overseas contracts and thus pays a variety of percentages to international tax collectors. This year, the company expects their blended tax rate to be in the range of 15% to 17% range, versus forecasts of 5% to 7%. Bummer.
But should investors send a stock to the woodshed because of a higher effective tax rate? Not in my book. The effective tax rate is more about the location of projects in any given year than the fundamentals of the business itself. Has the underlying business weakened because more projects take place in countries with higher tax rates? Conversely, when the effective tax rate inevitably drops back down, will the underlying business have improved?
Personally, I'd rather focus on the demand drivers for Wireless Facilities' services (increasing), SG&A as a percentage of revenue (decreasing), revenue per employee (increasing), and balance sheet (pristine -- $114 million cash, no debt). Also, I like the look of Wireless Facilities' operating income. It grew from a loss of $55 million in '02 to a gain of $22 million in '03, and is expected to hit $39 million and $51 million in '04 and '05, respectively.
By the way, I'm not the only one who likes the company's prospects. Wireless Facilities' new CEO, Eric DeMarco, just purchased more than $615,000 worth of shares in the company.
"Effective tax rate" be damned. Wireless Facilities is strong and getting stronger.
Want to talk about all things wireless? Check out the Wireless World discussion board.
Motley Fool contributor Ted Rogers is a writer from Virginia. He owns options in Wireless Facilities, and holds shares in Sprint PCS and LCC International.