Pandering to public whims can cut both ways. That's a lesson learned by Ford
In recent government rollover tests, several popular SUVs, including Ford's Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer, GM's
The results seem to confirm the established notion -- sometimes disputed by the carmakers -- that SUVs have a much greater risk of rolling over and severely injuring their occupants.
The SUV has been a hot seller for over a decade, rising to nearly 25% of the car market. In that time, fatalities from rollover crashes have become increasingly common. Though they are only about 10% of crashes, rollovers account for one-third of highway crash fatalities. This year, preliminary government reports indicate the highest number of traffic fatalities since 1990, and a 10% increase in SUV rollover deaths since last year.
For its part, the automaker claims that such accidents are owed to driver error. Though I loathe the gas-sucking, lumbering behemoths on our roads, I have driven pickup trucks long enough to know that driving habits need to change in high, heavy vehicles.
But will appeals to personal responsibility be enough to keep other automakers from being stung by SUV-related safety lawsuits? Do automakers bear any liability when their most popular vehicles fail to perform as safely as other designs? Ultimately, your opinion -- and mine -- may not matter. It will be the opinion of the folks in the jury box that decides how much this problem will cost the companies, shareholders, and consumers.
For more Fool car coverage:
- See what GM is planning in China.
- Why Detroit should worry.
- Is there cannibalism at DaimlerChrysler?
Fool contributor Seth Jayson spends more time on a bike than behind a car wheel, and that's why he owns no company mentioned. View his Fool profile here.
