Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Knight Needs Volatility

By Bill Mann – Updated Nov 16, 2016 at 3:40PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Knight Trading suffers through the midst of some real trading doldrums.

Citing "persistent lackluster market conditions," trading execution specialist Knight Trading Group (NASDAQ:NITE) stated that it expects to lose money in its third quarter of 2004, lowering its guidance to a loss from a penny to 4 cents per share. Knight's warning puts the harsh light on other companies that are dependent on stock and other asset-trading volumes and volatility for their business, including Schwab (NYSE:SCH), Ameritrade (NASDAQ:AMTD), and LaBranche (NYSE:LAB).

Trading volumes for the third quarter of the year on Nasdaq, for example, declined about 9% from the previous quarter, which in itself wasn't anything to write home about. In addition to the poor operating environment, Knight's results are also likely to be impacted by an increase of expenses related to its ramping up of sales activities in the U.K., as well as poor performance at its Deephaven asset management division. Deephaven has a risk-arbitrage strategy that focuses on buying and shorting stocks in pairs for companies that are likely takeover targets. If merger and acquisition activity dries up, Deephaven's universe of investments shrinks.

The triple whammy on Knight could be severe, with revenues that may be as much as 30% below where they were last year. It's noteworthy, though, that Knight Trading's stock hasn't fallen that much. One explanation could be that even though such a trough in business isn't a positive for Knight, such an outcome is a logical outcome of a lull in the trading cycle and shows no real correlation with a weakening of Knight's business or competitive position. Knight does have the advantage of no longer having to worry about the SEC probes that dogged it for several years. In July the company paid $79 million to settle with regulators over lapses in its trading, supervision, and record-keeping activities from 1999 through 2001. Several former employees, including former CEO Ken Pasternak, face potential civil charges resulting for their roles in trading violations at the company. Of course, once Knight settled, that became their problem, not the company's.

It's a big deal in that the company isn't exactly socking away the cash over the short term. It would be a much bigger deal if Knight were losing ground to its competitors, something that isn't evident at the moment.

Bill Mann liked the name Knight-Trimark better. He does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. Schwab was a recommendation of the Motley Fool Stock Advisor .

None

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation Stock Quote
TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation
AMTD

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
329%
 
S&P 500 Returns
106%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/24/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.