Charles Schwab, the man, and Charles Schwab
Results for the second quarter were just shy of estimates on the EPS line, but I'd argue that the company's report was more positive than the Street seemed to believe. Revenue rose 21%, net income jumped 35%, and the company continues to improve its return on equity -- once again posting rates above 20%.
The brokerage also posted a 20% jump in new accounts from the year-ago period, while client assets rose more than 15%. There were, however, certainly parts of the report that the Street didn't appreciate so much. While client assets were up on an annual comparison, they did dip slightly on a sequential basis. Likewise, though June trades were up 29% on an annual comparison, they fell 15% sequentially, and management said that July was looking a bit weak as well.
In my book, month-by-month obsession with trading volume is counterproductive. Markets move up and down, and tough markets like these often produce weaker performance at retail brokers. But I don't think that sequentially soft trading revenue means that Schwab is losing the long-term battle with E*Trade
By the same token, Schwab isn't cheap enough to really get a lot more attention from me. I like that the company has returned to its roots and is cutting fees and prices. I also like that it has a large private bank and can benefit from ongoing growth in wealth management and trust operations. But I don't like all of the above enough to buy in today. After all, paying too much for the stock of a discount broker seems to really defeat the whole purpose.
For more financial Foolishness:
Charles Schwab is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick . David and Tom Gardner have singled out even more stocks you can take to the bank; the full list, and their two latest recommendations, are yours with a free 30-day trial subscription.
Fool contributor Stephen Simpson has no financial interest in any stocks mentioned (that means he's neither long nor short the shares).