Who'd have thought it? It appears that ExxonMobil
ExxonMobil, which currently produces in the Orinoco -- along with, among others, BP
The crude produced in the Orinoco is generally a low-quality, tar-like oil, which is converted by traditional refineries into about 600,000 barrels a day of synthetic fuel. Some energy professionals question whether PDVSA has the technical capability to operate the production projects effectively, or even to avoid damaging them. Those projects generally are valued at about $30 billion.
Furthermore, roughly 80% of Venezuela's petroleum revenue comes from the United States, where most of the refineries capable of processing the gooey crude are located. Venezuelan crude satisfies slightly more than 10% of crude import needs in the U.S.
The Orinoco projects provide nearly one-fourth of Venezuela's oil production, which currently approaches 2.5 million barrels per day. Chavez has used petroleum revenues in large part to fund massive social development projects for his nation's poor majority. Those projects led to his being reelected in a landslide in December.
Along with Venezuela, Nigeria, another OPEC member, with daily production of about 2.3 million barrels, appears to be becoming progressively shakier. Most of that nation's production comes from the Niger Delta or from nearby platforms offshore. That area's local tribesmen generally have been precluded from energy-related jobs. Instead, those relatively high-paying jobs have gone to those from more influential tribes farther inland. As a result, the local tribesmen have resorted to sabotaging production projects as an expression of their dissatisfaction and destitution. It's also feared that national elections scheduled for next month could lead to intensified violence directed at the production facilities.
Most Fools also know about the veritable loose cannon that is the government of Iran, which must deal with increasing domestic demand, along with the possibility of gamesmanship from Saudi Arabia's Sunni royal family. With all this in mind, I would advise the Foolish nation to be pleased on the days that crude prices decline -- as is the case as I write this.
But to assume that price disruptions cannot be translated into significant price escalations seems to me to be tantamount to donning decidedly rose-colored spectacles. Indeed, for my money, Fools would be well advised to maintain an international energy representation in the portfolios. In that connection, any of the companies mentioned above -- and especially ExxonMobil -- would seem to be appropriate candidates for Foolish investment attention.
For related Foolishness:
- Energy's Excessively Short-Term Orientation
- Is Crude Demand Slip-Sliding Away?
- Transocean at the Top?
Got something to say about these stocks? Say it in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's new, free, completely spiffy stock-rating service.
Fool contributor David Lee Smith does not own shares in any of the companies mentioned. He welcomes your questions or comments.
More from The Motley Fool
Can Big Oil Survive the Threat of Electric Vehicles?
Electric vehicles are gaining greater traction every day, and investors in the oil industry need to take notice.
3 Dividend Stocks With Better Yields Than Johnson & Johnson
These stocks would serve your income portfolio better than Johnson & Johnson today.
3 Top Oil Stocks to Buy in December
Oil prices are up, but oil stocks aren't. That's why investors should take a look at Diamondback Energy, ExxonMobil, and Transocean.