Talk about a hullabaloo. Pay packages at Wall Street firms from Morgan Stanley
So far, Obama's pay czar has tried to put restrictions on how much TARP-taking institutions could pay their top people -- a move which only inspired big banks like Bank of America
But the problem isn't how much bankers get paid -- that's simply a result of the obscene amounts of money that bankers are able to bring in for their respective firms. Reduce banker bonuses, and you'll simply end up with more profitable Wall Street firms. Investors in the banks might be overjoyed at this thought, but the broader economic good is hardly served by simply shifting payouts from the people who produce the massive profits, to the people who own the company reaping those massive profits.
Instead, we should focus on keeping the whole of Wall Street in line -- making sure that these firms are acting ethically and not creating financial time bombs that will put the entire economy at risk. In the lead-up to the financial crisis, we saw giant firms taking on extreme levels of leverage, scary and little-understood securities being concocted in back corners of the finance world, and non-banking activities putting major banks at risk of failure. It's understandable that huge paychecks based on these kinds of activities would inspire ire.
As seems to be the case so often in government, though, the treatment for the problems we're facing has been aimed mainly at symptoms -- such as bonuses -- rather than the root cause. After all, if Wall Street is making big money while working with and contributing to a functional and growing U.S. economy, I have no problem at all with fat paychecks.
Will Wall Street stocks make waves in 2010? Let Dan Caplinger know your pick for the best stock for 2010, and you could win a sweet prize.
Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer owns shares of Bank of America, but does not own shares of any of the other companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool. The Fool's disclosure policy has never once been caught with its pants down. Of course, it doesn't actually wear pants …