In an age when too many corporate bigwigs seem to feel entitled to outsized pay for pint-sized performance, one CEO has boldly flown against the prevailing winds. Hopefully, he'll become an example to others.
According to a British Airways spokesperson, CEO Willie Walsh has decided that refusing his $487,000 bonus is "the most appropriate thing to do."
Appropriate, indeed! British Airways' unionized workforce is hopping mad about cuts to their benefits and employment contracts -- all framed as byproducts of the company's current financial difficulties.
Walsh's decision to forgo his bonus is probably more common-sense than saintly. He obviously understands that it's difficult to argue for worker-unfriendly cost cuts when top brass continues to rake in big bucks. Alas, too few CEOs here in the U.S. seem to have made that same distinction.
In just one example of asinine audacity, AIG
Even beyond massive corporate bailouts, few chief executives or corporate boards here have seemed to understand that the sacrifices they expect from their workers ought to extend to their own pay packages as well.
U.S. execs willing to eat their own cost-cutting cooking have been few and far between. Starbucks
At least Willie Walsh seems to be thinking about appropriate behavior for a company facing tough times. I only wish we'd see a little more of that thoughtfulness on this side of the pond.
Which CEOs could use a pay cut? Which have shared the pain with their workforces? Let loose with your cheers and jeers in the comment box below.
More from The Motley Fool
Why General Motors Is Feeling Good About 2018 -- and Even Better About 2019
Despite profit "headwinds," GM's guidance is upbeat.
From Spreadsheets to Sticky Notes: 7 Strategies for Managing Your Job Search
No matter what your style is, we have the job search tip for you!
3 Tax Breaks for Homeowners
Homeowners have access to certain tax deductions that don't apply for renters -- and these tax breaks can add up to quite a sum.