The speed of the smartphone and mobile computing caught several large firms asleep at the wheel. Beyond Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) and its slow roll out of competitive mobile processors, a number of mobile phone providers also didn't realize the sea change of consumer spending that smartphones have brought about.

Big plans, failed dreams
Chief among these was LG, the third largest mobile company in the world. While LG ships nearly 30 million mobile units per quarter, which is roughly 9% of global market share, researcher Gartner pegs its smartphone market share at just 1.2%.

So LG's playing a game of catch up, but still didn't spare any bluster when announcing smartphone sales goals and a new tablet concept back in August. Chang Ma, the VP of marketing for LG's mobile devices, compared LG's tablet favorably to Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPad. His claims of a superior tablet sparked quite a bit of Internet chatter and anticipation for what LG had up its sleeve.

Well, it's nearly two months later, and we have an answer to what LG's been hiding up its sleeve: nothing.

Android: a work in progress
Bloomberg recently reported that LG's shelved its tablet ambitions until next year. The culprit: Google's Android operating system just isn't ready for tablet prime time yet. While Apple's iOS has shown that smartphone operating systems scale very well to tablets, that comes with plenty of added development from Apple to ensure apps transition well from the iPhone to the larger iPad.

In addition, Apple has courted an impressive array of developers to design apps suited specifically for the iPad; there are now more than 30,000 iPad-specific apps. Android apps aren't currently optimized for larger screens, and many apps won't run at all on tablets.

Rather than follow Samsung, Toshiba, and other tablet suppliers into offering a less-than-optimized tablet experience with the current generation of Android, LG is waiting for Google to deliver a new version, named Gingerbread, that's optimized for tablet computers.

While I can't fault LG's decision to wait for a better tablet, their tacit admission that Android isn't ready to take on the iPad in its current form is bad news for companies whose tablet ambitions rely on Android. It means that there shouldn't be competitive Android tablets during the crucial holiday season, and also enables Apple to build up a further content advantage as apps optimized for the iPad continue pouring in.

Chipmakers, more to lose?
However, the companies with more to lose might be the chip makers salivating at Android-based tablet sales. LG's announcement that they were developing a tablet was paired with news they'd be using NVIDIA's (Nasdaq: NVDA) Tegra 2 processor in some of their upcoming smartphones. Since Tegra's touted as a multimedia powerhouse, this naturally led to speculation NVIDIA could nab a tablet win from LG as well. However, any potential tablet wins now look to be pushed far into the future.

Other companies like Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN) and Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) stand to lose as well. As consumers swap out netbook sales for tablets instead, this moves revenue from Intel's wheelhouse into the varying companies utilizing ARM Holding's power-efficient designs. However, since Apple is now designing its own processors, these companies need Android to take hold if they want to see increasing tablet momentum. Any continuing delays in a competitive Android tablet platform hurts chipmakers not essential to Apple's supply chain.

Is Marvell damaged goods?
One last company seeing tablet fortunes swing against it might be Marvell Technology (Nasdaq: MRVL). Marvell has a long partnership with Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM), so it was naturally assumed RIM would base their newest tablet on Marvell's advanced Armada 610 processor. However, recent reports from Rodman & Renshaw analyst Ashok Kumar indicate that RIM grew tired of poor performance from Marvell's Armada processor and kicked it to the curb. In its place sits a processor from Texas Instruments.

Seeing as how Marvell not only has a long history of developing ARM processors but also holds a valuable "microarchitecture" license which allows it to make further modifications to ARM's processor core technology, this is a major blow. You'd expect stronger performance from a top-of-the line processor that was announced at the beginning of 2010. More importantly, any damage between Marvell and RIM that could spill over into smartphone designs would be an enormous blow to the company.

More reason to love Apple
The bottom line is that while Apple was initially critiqued for the iPad essentially being a large copy of the iPhone, the quality of Apple's launch stands far above rivals who will be nearly a year behind Apple in launching optimized tablets.

As these competitors fall further behind Apple continues its dominating content lead and also gains more scale to acquire cheaper components. That's bad news for competitors whose main tablet selling point is an ability to undercut Apple's selling price.

For investors dreaming of tablet riches, if your portfolio doesn't include Apple, it looks like the tablet boom just took a detour. While companies like Texas Instruments, Qualcomm, Marvell and NVIDIA still stand to see long-term benefits from tablets, for the time being, investors in these companies will have to be content with Android's stunning smartphone ascent.

Eric Bleeker owns shares of NVIDIA. Google and Intel are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. Apple and NVIDIA are Motley Fool Stock Advisor choices. Motley Fool Options has recommended buying calls on Intel. The Fool owns shares of Apple, Google, Intel, Marvell Technology Group, Qualcomm, and Texas Instruments. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days

True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.