I hope that by now most of my readers have heard about the Bakken, a multibillion-barrel oil resource play in the Rockies. Like the Barnett and other gas shale plays, the Bakken play is brought to you by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. There are differences in the particulars, but those are the key enabling technologies allowing folks such as EOG Resources
Following success in the Barnett, operators scrambled to find good gas shale analogues in places such as the Haynesville and the Marcellus. That search has since expanded to Europe, Asia, and elsewhere. The same thing is happening with oil resource plays. We've seen Hess team up with Toreador Resources
What's old is new again
The Niobrara has actually seen historical drilling in places like Wyoming's Silo field. What makes the play "new" today is, again, the aforementioned drilling and completion technologies that allow for much stronger flow rates. The Niobrara's potential became plain following the success of EOG's Jake well, which produced around 50,000 barrels of oil in its first 90 days.
Early Bakken pioneer Continental Resources
What's in a well?
Whether they're operating in the Wattenberg field or elsewhere in the play, most companies tackling the Niobrara are falling roughly in line with Noble's average EURs. Continental is estimating 286 MBoe per well, PDC Energy
Same stuff, different basin?
The real outlier appears to be Chesapeake Energy
In the PRB (more famous for its coal than any other resource), the shale targets run much deeper than in the DJ. For example, SM Energy's Atlas 1-19H well had a measured depth of roughly 12,000 feet, whereas Chesapeake's Spillman 16-1H well traveled more than 17,000 feet. These PRB wells may deliver considerably higher average reserves and production rates, but they're also going to be more expensive to drill.
Chesapeake probably shouldn't be lumping these plays together, and I certainly encourage investors to avoid doing so.
Adding it up
So circling back to my original question: What's the size of the Niobrara prize? Say a million acres ultimately prove economically viable. At 320-acre spacing, that's 3,125 well locations. Assuming wells average 290 MBoe (given a wider range of perhaps 200 to 500 MBoe), we're talking about over 900 million barrels equivalent of reserves that are up for grabs.
While it's very early -- as of the date of Chesapeake's recent analyst day, only 33 wells had been drilled -- this looks like a very promising play. For those seeking leverage to the Niobrara's potential, they might want to size up PDC or Rex -- two smaller exploration and production companies with relatively large footholds.
Chesapeake Energy is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation.
Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his Motley Fool CAPS profile or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
These 3 Oil Stocks Could Be the Biggest Winners if Crude Keeps Rising (and 2 That Would Surprisingly Lose Out)
Oil hedges help producers protect cash flow when crude prices fall, but it also puts a ceiling on their upside.
OPEC Sticks to Its Plan, Which Is Excellent News for These Oil Stocks
Low-cost shale drillers could thrive in a higher oil price environment in 2018.
This Is What Makes EOG Resources Inc. Different From Other Oil Companies
For this oil company, it’s all about drilling the right rocks.