It's relatively easy to single out the most active of the U.S. independent oil and gas operators. On the basis of its bulging acreage position and active drilling program, the clear winner is Chesapeake Energy
However, identifying the most active member of the integrated operators is a tougher task, if only because it involves taking into account the companies' presence in global venues, none of which would make the cut as garden spots. I'm referring to places such as Azerbaijan, West Africa, the Arctic, or waters deep enough to render the site of last year's Gulf of Mexico tragedy a virtual wading pool. But as I look at the group that comprises Big Oil, I find myself becoming progressively more intrigued by the active pace of Royal Dutch Shell
Diving back into the Gulf
For starters, the Netherlands-based company is likely to become the industry leader in putting rigs to work on new exploratory programs in the Gulf of Mexico, following the BP
Under the procedures administered by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement, companies must first receive approval for exploration plans before applying for permits to drill. In March, Shell became the first operator to receive approval on a new drilling plan, which, if ultimately permitted, would allow the company to initiate three new exploratory wells in 2,950 feet of Gulf water. Then, a second Shell plan was approved last week and would allow the drilling of five wells as part of its Appomattox discovery in 7,200 feet of water more than 70 miles from the Louisiana coast.
Prodded to a picked up pace
The pokey permitting pace maintained by the BOEMRE since the deepwater drilling moratorium was canceled in October has raised the dander among a number of Congressmen, who are attempting to institute three bills that would hasten the process. Led by Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), the first bill passed the House of Representatives this month. It would require the Obama administration to pursue four lease sales -- three in the Gulf and another offshore Virginia. The previously planned sales were delayed or canceled following the tragedy aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig.
Noting that the moratorium cost 12,000 jobs and the removal of a dozen rigs from the Gulf -- seven of which were deepwater units, while the remainder were shallow water rigs -- Hastings and his colleagues last week passed a second bill to nudge the administration to observe a faster permitting pace.
Known as the Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act, the second bill would allow the Interior Department just 30 days to approve or deny an application for a permit. However, two 15-day extensions would be allowed in the event that the applicant received written notice detailing the reasons for the holdup.
The third bill is now being debated in the House. If passed and signed into law, it would allow drilling along a sizable portion of the East Coast, Southern California, the Arctic Ocean, and Bristol Bay in Alaska.
Another side fights on
The Hastings bills are hardly sailing to passage without opposition, however. For instance, Bill Snape, the senior counsel for the Center for Biological Diversity, noted that the Deepwater Horizon tragedy "was caused in large part because of the lack of environmental review." He also objected to a provision in the second bill that would require that challenges to permits, leases, or plans be brought before the 5th Circuit district court.
He observed that, "It is a factual reality that, in at least one case, a majority of the 5th Circuit was not able to even rule on a climate change case because of oil company- related conflicts."
Chilling out in Alaska
Meanwhile, while the fat remains in the fire in the Gulf of Mexico, and following several disappointments, Shell is still attempting to gain permission from the Environmental Protection Agency to drill in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas off Alaska, where it has already spent about $3.5 billion -- and several years -- for exploratory efforts and drilling preparation.
The Interior Department has responsibility for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, while Alaska falls under the purview of the EPA. And while it had appeared earlier that roadblocks established by the agency likely would thwart Shell's planned drilling offshore Alaska, executives of Shell recently met with EPA officials and energy aides from the Obama administration.
The company's executives later called the discussions "more positive." Beyond that, Gina McCarthy, the EPA's assistant administrator for air and radiation, expressed a conviction that Shell "believes the three permits that we're processing now will be very valuable to them."
And in the Arctic
Meanwhile, talks apparently are continuing between Russia's massive oil company OAO Rosneft and BP regarding a deal agreed to in January wherein the companies would ante up a combined $16 billion to facilitate a share swap in preparation for jointly exploring in the Russian Arctic. And while the talks appear to have taken on a somewhat more positive tone after the deal was roundly opposed by AAR, a group of Russian oligarchs who serve as equal partners with BP in TNK-BP, the country's third-largest oil company, a resolution of the differences remains far from a foregone conclusion.
As a result, Shell, ExxonMobil
So Shell in particular might be on the verge of initiating new activity in three separate and promising oil and gas venues. Given that triumvirate of attractive opportunities, I'm inclined to watch Europe's largest member of Big Oil more closely. I can't conceive of a more ideal way to do so than to add the company to your own watchlist.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own any of the shares named above. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.