As investors, we always want our investments to generate a healthy return. However, investors often forget that returns stem from two, not one, extremely important factors:
- The business's ability to generate profits.
- The price you pay for one share of those profits.
This idea of price versus returns provides the bedrock for the school of investing known as value investing. In this series, I'll examine a specific business from both a quality and pricing standpoint. Hopefully, in doing so, we can get a better sense of its potential as an investment right now.
Where should we start to find value?
As we all know, the quality of businesses vary widely. A company that has the ability to grow its bottom line faster (or much faster) than the market, especially with any consistency, gives its owner greater value than a stagnant or declining business (duh!). However, many investors also fail to understand that any business becomes a buy at a low enough price. Figuring out this price-to-value equation drives all intelligent investment research.
In order to do so today, I selected several metrics that will evaluate returns, profitability, growth and leverage. These make for some of the most important aspects to consider when researching a potential investment.
- Return on equity divides net income by shareholder's equity, highlighting the return a company generates for its equity base.
- The EBIT (short for Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) margin provides a rough measurement of the percent of cash a company keeps from its operations. I prefer using EBIT to other measurements because it focuses more exclusively on the performance of a company's core business. Stripping out interest and taxes makes these figures less susceptible to dubious accounting distortions.
- The EBIT growth rate demonstrates whether a company can expand its business.
- Finally, the debt-to-equity ratio reveals how much leverage a company employs to fund its operations. Some companies have a track record of wisely managing high debt levels, generally speaking though, the lower the better for this figure. I chose to use 5-year averages to help smooth away one-year irregularities that can easily distort regular business results.
Keeping that in mind, let's take a look at Agilent Technologies
Return on Equity (5-year avg.)
EBIT Margin (5-year avg.)
EBIT Growth (5-year avg.)
Total Debt / Equity
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Source: Capital IQ, a Standard &Poor's company.
We see kind of a mixed bag in terms of the business results here. Aligent has the best ROE out of the group. On the other hand, it does have the weakest operating margins here. Its strong growth and conservative financing both seem like plusses to me.
Almost the reverse of Aligent, Thermo Fisher has weak returns on its equity base, but has the second-strongest growth component in the field. Though its EBIT margin leaves something to be desired, I like its stable capital structure.
Bio-Rad generates a below-average but decent ROE. Its operating margin and EBIT growth put it squarely in the middle of the pack as well. Similar to the other companies seen here, its conservative debt-to-equity ratio reduces its overall riskiness.
Despite the group's best operating margin and EBIT growth, Illumina still produced a negative ROE for its investors over the last half-decade -- not the most positive sign. It has the most leverage out of any of the companies listed here, although it certainly isn't in "immediate danger" territory.
How cheap does Agilent Technologies look?
To look at pricing, I chose to look at two important multiples, price to earnings and enterprise value to free cash flow. Similar to a P/E ratio, Enterprise Value (essentially debt, preferred stock, and equity holders combined minus cash) to unlevered free cash flow conveys how expensive the entire company is versus the cash it can generate. This gives investors another measurement of cheapness when analyzing a stock. For both metrics, the lower the multiple, the better.
Let's check this performance against the price we'll need to pay to get our hands on some of the company's stock.
P/LTM Diluted EPS Before Extra Items
|Thermo Fisher Scientific||21.52||24.56|
Source: Capital IQ, a Standard & Poor's company.
From a multiple standpoint, these companies don't blow me out of the water. With the lowest figures sitting near 20, I feel somewhat unimpressed. With these numbers, the lower, the better.
In the end, none of these companies really has the outsized reward-risk characteristics that I try to find in potential investments.
While Agilent Technologies stock doesn't look like a stock for your portfolio right now, the search doesn't end here. In order to really get to know a company, you need to keep digging. If any of the companies mentioned here today piques your interest, further examining a company's quality of earnings, management track record, or analyst estimates all make for great ways to further your search. You can also stop by The Motley Fool's CAPS page where our users come to share their ideas and chat about their favorite stocks or click HERE to add them to My Watchlist.
Andrew Tonner holds no position in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Illumina and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.