The fresh-off-the-press Kindle Fire from (Nasdaq: AMZN) hasn't even made its way into the hands of eager customers, yet it's already facing a patent lawsuit.

The name of the offending patent troll is Acacia Research (Nasdaq: ACTG). More than likely, you've never heard of Acacia. Most people don't know patent trolls by name, other than Eastman Kodak (NYSE: EK). Acacia's sole business is that "through its operating subsidiaries," it "acquires, develops, licenses and enforces patented technologies." That's the most technical description I've heard of patent trolls.

Acacia is a small outfit out of California that sits with a $1.6 billion market cap and pulled in $39.7 million in revenue last quarter. The company owns or controls the rights to more than 184 patent portfolios. Interestingly, three licensees alone contributed 70% of last quarter's revenue. Acacia also frequently spars with other smartphone heavyweights, including Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM). Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) surrendered and entered a licensing deal last year.

In this case, the company is alleging that Amazon is infringing on four patents. Like most software patent suits nowadays, the patent is obscenely vague and practically applies to everything. The patent in question is U.S. Patent No. 6,956,562 granted in October 2005. This is the patent's description:

"A method for software control using a user-interactive display screen feature is disclosed that reduces stylus or other manipulations necessary to invoke software functionality from the display screen."

Not only is that sentence grammatically cumbersome, yet in all its wordiness it fails to actually describe something worth patenting.

Regardless of the outcome, this suit will serve only to pester the enormous e-tailer. Amazon will naturally proceed with selling millions of tablets and cornering the Android tablet market.

Add Amazon to your Watchlist to see the outcome of this suit. And get access to a free report on how Amazon is changing retail.