On the surface, you would think that Amazon.com's
A report from always-take-with-a-grain-of-salt Digitimes now claims that Google is "targeting" the Kindle Fire with a tablet of its own. It attributes upstream supply-chain sources to the idea that Google hates the Kindle Fire even more than Apple
Recipe for a bogus report
The publication says Big G will launch a branded tablet in March or April, sporting a 7-inch display and running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. The biggest shocker is that it supposedly will undercut the Kindle Fire's already bargain $199 price point.
Toss in the hints that Google Chairman Eric Schmidt dropped recently that "in the next six months," Google will be marketing a "tablet of the highest quality," which would presumably carry its flagship Nexus branding, add in nine pinches of healthy skepticism, and what do you get?
A bogus report.
A spotty reputation to maintain
First and foremost, you should always be mindful that rumors are just that: rumors. A disproportionately high number of rumblings from the endless tech rumor mill find their roots from Digitimes' Taiwanese headquarters. Its proximity to the Asian component supply chain is probably why it's always garnered moderate levels of credibility over the years, but its recent track record has been lousy.
MacRumors pegs the publication's accuracy rate in the ballpark of 55%, which doesn't even seem all that bad for an entity known for being hit or miss. Anytime you run into a Digitimes rumor, it wouldn't be misplaced to flip a coin on whether you should believe it, but there have been an awful lot of misses lately.
Some of their reports check out, like the one detailing how the iPad 3 will feature a Retina Display using indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) panels from Sharp. Others simply fall flat, like its prediction that Apple would unveil the new iPad at the MacWorld|iWorld conference at the end of this month that Apple hasn't officially attended since 2009 because the company now focuses less on trade shows. Cupertino now hosts its own events for product launches that have become media frenzies in their own right.
That being said, let's proceed with tearing down this bogus report.
A tablet oxymoron
It's not economically feasible to market a "tablet of the highest quality" for less than $199. By virtue of the Nexus brand, a Google flagship Nexus Tablet would definitively set the standard for what an Android tablet should be. Just like the Nexus smartphone lineup, it would be a benchmark for other Android OEMs to use as a starting point.
If there's one thing the Kindle Fire isn't, it's a tablet of the highest quality. That's not to say it's a bad tablet, but anyone with one sitting in his or her Amazon.com Shopping Cart preparing to click "Proceed to Checkout" should already have tempered expectations as to what kind of gadget $199 will buy, especially without the subsidies that wireless carriers hand out for smartphones.
Amazon has made a lot of concessions to get the device's cost down to the reported $201.70, such as ditching any type of camera.
"If Larry and Eric both jumped off a cliff, would you jump, too?"
Pricing a Nexus tablet below $199 would also be a pretty harsh blow to every single one of Google's Android OEM partners that have tablet aspirations. It would effectively price them out of the market in a move that should be considered opening the door and showing them the way. As unrealistic as it is for Google to come out with a quality tablet for under $199, try multiplying that feeling by 10 and seeing how quickly your friends become your enemies.
Android tablets have been putting up underwhelming figures thus far, with Hewlett-Packard's
Larry Page is now coming up on his one-year anniversary as CEO, but he's not shortsighted enough to pull a move like this, and neither is Eric Schmidt.
Nexus to the rescue!
Android tablets are in shambles and in dire need of a rescue. The Kindle Fire is the only one doing well, and it's off doing its own thing after Amazon hijacked what it needed and pointed the tablet to its own content offerings, snubbing its brethren in the process.
Google needs a Nexus tablet to rally its forces. I have no doubts that Google is working on a high-quality Nexus Tablet, probably with proposed subsidiary Motorola Mobility
With iOS and Android leading the mobile revolution, some winners are hard to see -- because they're buried inside the gadgets. The proliferation of mobile gadgets is going to be breathtaking, and a handful of companies stand to rake in the profits as consumers snap up each year's latest and greatest models. We've just released a new special free report on 3 Hidden Winners of the iPhone, iPad, and Android Revolution. In it, you'll find three companies that supply crucial components that virtually every mobile device relies on. Check it out now -- it's free.
Fool contributor Evan Niu owns shares of Apple and Amazon.com, but he holds no other position in any company mentioned. Check out his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google, and Amazon.com. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Google, Apple, and Amazon.com and creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
CES 2018: 5 Developments You Need to Know About
CES always promises exciting new ideas, and this year’s event was no different.
Is Energy Storage the Key to Unlocking the "Smart" in Smart Homes?
Tech companies have had a hard time making the smart home a reality, but energy storage could change the dynamic.
How Big Tech Is Profiting by Selling AI-as-a-Service
The nascent technology of artificial intelligence is more widely used than you may think.