At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.
Wall Street zigs, Jefferies zags
Over the past three months, shares of Canadian National Railway
What do these four stocks have in common? Well, most obviously -- and luckily, for early investors -- they're all involved in the transportation of goods. Just a few months ago, this was looking like a bad business to be in. But as pessimism over the fate of the economy hit its zenith, one analyst stepped out in front of the freight train (or tractor-trailer, if you prefer) to argue that the negativism had to stop. The bad news was overblown, argued Jefferies & Co. "U.S. freight flows had started to strengthen," and it was time to invest in a few good transport stocks.
Turns out they were right ... and that's why investors should be nervous today.
Time to zag again?
Last time around, Jefferies was right about FedEx, UPS, and all the rest. But now, the analyst has changed his mind. Warning that "short-cycle indicators recently turned negative," Jefferies pulled its buy ratings on FedEx, UPS, and J.B. Hunt this morning. (Jefferies actually dropped Canadian National all the way to "sell," but, according to StreetInsider.com, this is primarily because the analyst believes investors will be shifting their bets from Canadian National to Canadian Pacific
But Canadian National/Pacific aside, is Jefferies right about the rest of these stocks? Is it time to put them on the shelf?
A recent report out of the Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index suggests it may be. The report, which tracks "real-time diesel fuel consumption" as a proxy for the transport sector, shows that growth in the industry continues remains at near-stall levels. After rising a significant 1.1% in October, the Index has shown anemic growth levels of 0.1% in November and 0.2% in December. While these numbers are "positive," they're only barely so -- and seem far too low to support the kinds of double-digit stock price gains we've seen at FedEx, for example.
Foolish takeaway
When you consider that UPS is now selling for 18 times earnings (despite a mere 12% long-term growth forecast), that J.B. Hunt costs 24 times earnings (albeit at a healthier 18% growth forecast), you have to wonder if the bulls have gotten a bit carried away with their stampede into transports these past few months.
Sure, FedEx looks more reasonable at 16 times earnings and a projected 16% growth rate. But here's the key: All three of these stocks (and Canadian National as well -- let's not let them off the hook) are currently generating significantly less free cash flow than they report as net income. None of them is as profitable as they look. FedEx in particular, with just $606 million in trailing free cash flow, appears terribly expensive at a price-to-FCF ratio of nearly 47.
So FedEx? UPS? J.B. Hunt? Personally, I wouldn't buy any of them at today's prices. And Jefferies is right to be telling you to avoid them.
Looking for a safer place to put your money ... and maybe even earn a bit of profit? Read our new report: Too Small to Fail: Two Small Caps the Government Won't Let Go Broke. It's free to download today, but it won't be so forever -- so click quick.
