After a year of embarrassing flops, Netflix
CEO Reed Hastings bubbled up near the top of many "Worst CEO of 2011" lists, and given the beating that the stock took from its all-time peak in July to its bottoming out a couple months later, some of the knocks were earned.
However, we now see how far Netflix has bounced back in such a short amount of time.
Consumerist.com concluded its annual contest for the Worst Company in America this week.
Netflix, fittingly enough, made the cut as one of the 32 finalists.
However, consumers have warmed up to the video service giant to the point where Netflix got eliminated from contention in the very first round.
You like me -- you really like me
Netflix was pitted against GameStop
GameStop is an odd nominee. Why is GameStop so vile? Yes, it sells new games at retail prices, but it has a loyalty shopping program that makes it compelling to do exactly that. It pays a pittance on trade-ins that it then resells at juicy markups, but why is that so terrible?
We live in a capitalistic society. If someone could put GameStop out of business by offering lower prices and better trade-in terms, why hasn't that happened? No one forces die-hard gamers to buy their titles and gear at GameStop.
GameStop isn't vile. Surely it was being placed in this battle so that the evil empire of Netflix would move on to the second of five rounds.
Well, the Consumerist.com readers didn't see it that way. GameStop collected a little more than 70% of the votes. It wasn't even close. Many of the reader comments pointed out that while the summertime price increase and short-lived Qwikster fiasco were bad business moves, it didn't mean that Netflix was a company for consumers to loathe. Netflix's quick reversal on Qwikster even won some raves.
"GameStop is just bad in so many categories," one voter wrote. "Netflix at least has listened to customers and changed their mind about things."
On to the next round
GameStop, if you're curious, went on to lose to Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart? Yes, it was definitely a peculiar slate of nominees. GameStop is evil because it charges too much, and Wal-Mart is vile because of how far it will go to make sure that it charges customers too little.
However, back to Netflix, if it's not as loathed by consumers as GameStop -- or Wal-Mart, for that matter -- could it be that it has overcome last year's blunders and poorly executed initiatives?
Nod your head if you want to give the correct answer.
The mathematics of an apology accepted
Consumers, subscribers, and shareholders have all forgiven Netflix.
Pull up a stock quote. The same stock that traded as low as $62.37 five months ago is trading nearly 80% higher today.
Pull up its latest quarterly report. After a sharp slide during the third quarter, Netflix tacked on net new streaming customers during the fourth quarter. Yes, DVD-based customers continue to decline, but that's not Netflix's platform for growth these days.
Is Netflix as respected as it was a year ago? Probably not. It may have a record number of total subscribers right now, but its once-sterling reputation did take a few body blows that may be slow to heal.
However, at the end of the day it's hard to argue against simple math. The stock chart, quarterly financials, and now the Consumerist.com poll show that Netflix's apology has been accepted.
Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has been a fan of Netflix as a disruptor for nearly a decade, but there's a new rule-breaking multibagger that's getting him excited these days. Learn more in a free report that you can check out right now.