This year's horse-racing Triple Crown hopeful, I'll Have Another, has been scratched from the Belmont Stakes race. For a great many Belmont Stakes betters, this is great news, because they were about to make a terrible mistake.
Last week, Motley Fool Money fans were treated to a great interview with horse-racing expert Steven Crist. For those who didn't catch the interview (though I highly suggest that you go back and listen to the whole thing), here is what Crist had to say about the then-favorite of Belmont:
The last 11 horses who've won the Derby and Preakness and came to the Belmont with the chance of winning the Triple Crown all lost at the Belmont. Despite that, I'll Have Another is going to be roughly even money to win the Belmont. So if you're betting on I'll Have Another, you're taking 50-50 odds on something that has failed 11 times in a row. It's a terrible, terrible bet. Even if he wins this race that'll be only one out of the last 12 and you'll only have doubled your money.
Investors, do yourself a favor and don't brush that off, thinking, "That's just horse racing." What Crist is talking about is the exact same thing investors do all the time.
I'll Have Another is a fine horse, but winning the Triple Crown is a long shot. With only one of the last 12 horses able to pull it off, we could say that there would have been something like an 8% chance that I'll Have Another would have pulled it off. Meanwhile, the way betters were wagering, it implied that there was more like a 50% chance that it would happen.
And as Crist went on to note, this is the same kind of pattern that emerges every time a horse has a shot at the Triple Crown. As you can easily deduce from the numbers, betting on an 8% proposition that's priced like a 50% proposition is a great way to go broke betting on horses.
But is this really any different from the way investors went after, say, Facebook
Crist went on: "There are horses that are great bets at 3-to-1, and the same horse is a terrible bet at even money. I think similarly with buying stocks: There are wonderful companies whose stock is overpriced at any given moment, and it would be a bad investment even if it's a good company."
There are converse examples that fly in the face of this notion of avoiding supposedly overvalued stocks. Amazon.com
Will Facebook follow suit and deliver killer growth that will justify its high IPO-day price tag? It's certainly possible. But the broader point here is that investors who consistently make that long-shot bet and don't get compensated with long-shot odds -- in investing terms, that would be a low valuation -- will likely end up net losers.
Crist again: "[I realized] it really was a game that was as much about value as it was about picking winners. … What you look for is for the public to make mistakes in valuation and take advantage of those mistakes."
While everyone is busy talking about Facebook and other highfliers, companies like ConocoPhillips
Dividend payers are rarely the flashy front-runners of the investment world, but as any race fan knows, a good closer can dominate the early leaders. Check out nine great dividend picks in The Motley Fool's special report, "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks."
Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer does not have a financial interest in any of the companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool or Facebook. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com and Facebook. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Amazon.com. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.