In a hypothetical contest pitting octogenarian moguls Warren Buffett and Rupert Murdoch against one another in an investment sense contest, I'm betting most observers would favor Buffett. However, as an erstwhile journalism professor, I'm likely to cast my vote for Murdoch, given the duo's recent respective leanings in the forlorn realm of publishing.
Splitting News Corp.
Let's look at Murdoch's handiwork first. As you likely know, during the waning days of June it was decided that News Corp.
The entertainment part of the company, from which the publishing portion will be separated, will be made up of film producer Twentieth Century Fox, the Fox News cable channels, and Fox Broadcasting. Under the plan approved unanimously by the company's board, current shareholders of News Corp. will end up with one share each of the publishing arm and the more lucrative entertainment entity for each share of the combined company they currently own.
Murdoch will be CEO of the entertainment unit and chairman of the publishing company. A CEO for the latter has yet to be designated. There appears to be a possibility that, once the separation has been completed, additional publishing acquisitions could be considered, but that effort is likely far down the road.
The decision to divide the company into its component parts clearly relates in part to a phone-hacking scandal at News Corp.'s British newspapers that resulted in the shuttering of the News of the World newspaper. But probably more important for the long term is the recognition that the world of newspapers is unlikely to halt its slide in subscribers and advertising revenues. Precisely five years ago, for instance, The New York Times Company
The Oracle's a budding paper boy
However, Buffett appears not to concur with the likely perpetuation of that phenomenon. After acquiring The Buffalo News in upstate New York back in 1977, the so-called "Oracle of Omaha" has seemed to be picking off newspaper properties with both hands thus far in 2012. In May, for instance he stuffed 63 small-market newspapers acquired from Media General
Admittedly, smaller rags have held up better than their larger brethren during the decades-long movement away from newspapers toward Internet content. Newspaper retention in the smaller burgs relates largely to coverage of local sports and politics. Nevertheless, in my own medium-sized city, the Sunday sports scene shares a section with local obituaries, and the latter frequently make for more captivating reading.
But Buffett hasn't stopped with the Media General purchases. Last month he followed up by picking up a couple of Texas papers, one being the Waco Tribune Herald. At this rate, I'd be difficult to convince that his shopping spree has ended.
Tripped by Tribune
A couple of weeks ago, in discussing Buffett's latest acquisitions, The Wall Street Journal noted that "Mr. Buffett is emotionally motivated." Unfortunately, that's all too often the case with newspapers and those who have accumulated fortunes elsewhere. For instance, five years ago Chicago real-estate investor Sam Zell headed a group that privatized Tribune Company, then the owner of such major metropolitan dailies as the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times, along with the hapless Chicago Cubs baseball team.
Zells' deal involved complex financial engineering, the main element of which forced the newly privatized entity to groan under the weight of $12 billion in debt. As I then observed to Fools, "That seems patently excessive for a company whose assets will continue to be in the declining newspaper and broadcasting industries." Today Tribune is attempting to crawl out from under the yoke of the bankruptcy protection it was forced to seek quickly after the restructuring was completed.
As Tribune's restructuring was going down, Zell was heard to maintain: "If you are relevant, people are going to buy the newspaper. If you're not relevant, then people will stop buying the newspaper and stop advertising and we'll all be in a stew of trouble." The journalism prof in me forces a contention that the current newspaper stew is stocked as much by a lack of timeliness as by reduced relevance.
The Foolish bottom line
Today, Foolish investors obviously can buy newspaper companies, while the makers of the obsolete buggy whips have all gone bye-bye. In my rarely tentative opinion, however, I'm jaundiced about the wisdom of following the Oracle down the path of publishing purchases.
If you agree that, newspaper stocks don't belong in your fold -- especially amid today's topsy-turvy market conditions -- we have some ideas that may better suit your preferences. For instance, I'd suggest that you take a gander at Motley's absolutely free report: "3 Stocks to Own For The New Industrial Revolution." Simply click here and it'll be yours for the asking.
Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own shares in any of the companies named in the above article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.