At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.
And speaking of the worst ...
This has been a rather unappetizing year for investors in Franco-American telecom equipment giant Alcatel-Lucent
How bad could things get? According to the Swiss banker, Alcatel -- at $1.06 a share now -- could fall as low as $0.78 per share, losing another quarter of its already depleted market cap over the course of the next 12 months.
Time to abandon ship?
So ... is this the endgame for Alcatel? Is it time for investors to cash in their chips, accept their losses, go home, and begin licking their wounds?
Sadly, yes.
Here's the deal, folks. As I explained last month, Alcatel is between a rock and a hard place. After giving investors a brief glimmer of hope late last year, Alcatel quickly reverted to its cash-burning ways in 2012. The company still has about $200 million in cash-net-of-debt, but if Alcatel keeps burning the stuff at its recent rate (about $470 million per year), then within six months we could see the company "go negative." It will still have upwards of $6 billion cash at its disposal -- but it will have even more debt than cash.
Alcatel's taking steps to mitigate the damage, and it hopes to cut its costs by $1.6 billion annually through a combination of management shuffling and corporate restructuring, but Alcatel has been talking about cutting costs for years, and so far it's been unable to stop the flow of red ink. What the company really needs to complete a turnaround, of course, is a revival in the telecom market.
iPhone to the rescue?
Many investors believe (hope?) that the advent of Apple's
Problem is, it's not working out that way. Verizon spent 17% less on infrastructure buildout in the first six months of 2012 than it did in H1 2011. It recently confirmed that H2 of this year won't make up the difference, with full-year capex spending continuing to lag what it spent in 2011. And Verizon's failure to spend may have a knock-on effect throughout the industry -- the opposite of starting an arms race in upgrades, Verizon's go-slow approach could lessen pressure on its rivals to up their own spending.
Compounding the lack of urgency, The Wall Street Journal recently observed that AT&T could soon find itself "the largest spectrum owner among major U.S. wireless companies ... by a large margin." This, too, argues against the idea that the company feels itself under pressure to spend more on telecom equipment.
Alcatel rides the roller coaster
Now, make no mistake: Capital spending on telecom is a cyclical industry. The longer the telcos delay building out their networks, the greater the pent-up demand for such investment will become. Phone usage is only going to grow over time, and data consumption and demand for faster speeds with it. Ultimately, the money will flow, and telecom equipment makers like Alcatel and its rivals will benefit.
They'll benefit, that is, if they survive the bad times, and stick around. The problem with Alcatel is that that with no money coming in the door, and the debt collectors starting to knock at the door, it may not be here to enjoy the good times when they come 'round again.
Want to learn more about how Apple is shaping the telecom equipment industry to its liking, and making companies like Alcatel dance to its iPods? Our analysts recently prepped a detailed report on Apple's prospects, and you can read it here today.
