Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

A Brighter Future for Chesapeake Energy?

By Arjun Sreekumar - Apr 6, 2013 at 12:00PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

After reporting significant progress in meeting production and expense targets, has Chesapeake changed its ways?

With a reconstituted Board of Directors in place and former CEO Aubrey McClendon out of the picture, investors are wondering if Chesapeake Energy (CHKA.Q) deserves a second chance.

As the company continues its search for McClendon's successor, Chief Operating Officer Steve Dixon has assumed the temporary role of acting CEO.

In a conference call on Monday, Dixon helped restore investor confidence in the company's future. He noted that Chesapeake's new focus on financial discipline will be a defining characteristic going forward, as opposed to just a temporary measure intended to reassure its creditors.

In particular, he highlighted three key priorities for the company: "We will remain focused on increasing our liquids production, driving capital efficiencies across our business and enhancing our financial flexibility to prudently fund our future growth."

Dixon also expressed "tremendous confidence" that Chesapeake's spending would not exceed its planned capital expenditure budget of around $6 billion.  

Has a more cautious, financially disciplined Chesapeake emerged from the shadows of its old, risk-loving self? Or do old habits die hard?

Chesapeake's recent progress
Based on its progress over the past few quarters, Chesapeake certainly seems to be on the right path. It's achieving several key objectives and even surpassing major production milestones. For the first quarter, Dixon said the company's current level of leasehold capital spending is on track to come in below its budgeted target. Similarly, it's also on track to achieve its production targets for the quarter, despite some midstream outages and weather-related challenges in the mid-continent.

The company's progress in reducing well costs and cycle times has also been impressive. In the fourth quarter, it reported an average spud-to-spud time of 18 days, down more than 30% from the year-earlier quarter. And over the same time period, average drilling and completion costs per well also declined by about 30%. For 2013, the company expects lease operating and G&A expenses to come in at or below budget.

These new developments stand in sharp contrast to the company's previous tendency of overshooting on its targets and estimates.  

Not only did it frequently exceed initial estimates for its spending budget in previous years, it has also been known to overestimate production figures and property values. The most recent instance was when it received just under $2,400 per acre for its Mississippi Lime assets, which it agreed to sell to Chinese oil company Sinopec (SHI -2.45%) in February.

That value was just a fraction of the $7,000-$8,000 per acre value the company assigned to those assets last year. It was also significantly less than the price SandRidge Energy (NYSE: SD), another major player in the Mississippi Lime, received for its assets in the play back in 2011. In successive transactions with Atinum Partners and Repsol YPF, SandRidge received about $4,425 and $2,750 per acre. Notably, SandRidge's acreage didn't have any currently producing wells, unlike Chesapeake's, making Chesapeake's deal appear even more underwhelming.

What to expect going forward
Looking ahead, the company still faces a substantial funding gap -- the difference between its expected cash flow and capital spending -- for the year, which it estimates to be $4 billion.

To help plug this gap, Chesapeake hopes to generate proceeds from asset sales totaling $4 billion to $7 billion. Thus far, it has negotiated or closed deals covering $1.5 billion of that target.

Though its recent deal with Sinopec came in significantly below expectations, the company is optimistic about future asset sales, with Dixon stating, "We're particularly pleased with the markets response to multiple small asset packages that we have offered."

Earlier this week, Houston-based Gastar Exploration (NYSEMKT: GST) announced its plans to purchase a portion of Chesapeake's central Oklahoma assets for around $85 million.  

Prime candidates for divestiture this year include some of Chesapeake's less valuable assets, with the company currently marketing portions of its acreage in the Marcellus and Utica shales.  

Going forward, the company will continue to focus on its core holdings, especially the Eagle Ford in Texas, which is expected to be the main driver of the company's liquids production growth for the year.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Chesapeake Energy Corporation Stock Quote
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited Stock Quote
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Company Limited
$19.09 (-2.45%) $0.48

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 05/28/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.