Recently, Motley Fool financial analyst Matt Koppenheffer took a hard dive into some serious number crunching, to correlate the relationship between several commonly used metrics for predicting financial stock performances, and how well those stocks actually did over the past 10 years.
In this video, he and his fellow Foolish financial analyst David Hanson discuss which metrics really did correlate to a strong performance over that period, and how people should invest today based on that information.
David Hanson has no position in any stocks mentioned. Matt Koppenheffer has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase. and Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Better Stock: Wells Fargo (WFC) vs. Citigroup (C)
The two banks have had plenty of ups and downs over the last decade or so. Here's the one I think has more "up" potential right now.
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) Q4 2017 Earnings Conference Call Transcript
WFC earnings call for the period ending December 31, 2017.
Wells Fargo Earnings: Not Great, but It's All About the Future
Wells Fargo's scandal-filled 2017 weighed on earnings, but tax reform gave the company a fourth-quarter boost.