Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over daily movements, we do like to keep an eye on market changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.
Stocks backed off Monday's record high close today, as the S&P 500 fell 0.3%. The narrower, price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) also lost 0.3%.
One stock bucked that trend, as shares of Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) added to yesterday's 9.3% rise for a two-day gain of 15.7%. So far this month, the stock has risen by a quarter. There is no explaining this week's price action, with no major breaking news concerning the company -- although that has not stopped pundits from trying.
Sure, the company released targeted ads that are tailored according to users' Web browsing history -- but that was last Thursday. These ads are expected to fetch higher ad rates.
Yes, Twitter added the capability to share photos via direct messages, something they announced on a Twitter blog today. That helps Twitter compete with messaging applications, which appear to be very hot in an overheated market for superfluous applications. Witness the $3 billion offer Facebook (NASDAQ: FB) made for Snapchat -- a company whose content literally vanishes almost immediately. On that basis, perhaps being able to attach pictures to direct messages is easily enough to justify today's $1.6 billion increase in Twitter's market value. In the rational world, however...
Finally, the most absurd explanation I read for Twitter's share "pop" is a rumor according to which legendary activist investor Carl Icahn is buying the stock. Icahn didn't become the second richest investor in the U.S. (behind Warren Buffett) by buying stocks that are almost certainly overpriced. Apple at an enterprise value of 2.6 times the next 12 months' revenue estimate, yes. Twitter at 29 times – certainly not.
Since pundits are using stale or fanciful information to explain why the stock is going up, I'll refer to news from last week to argue that users ought to be wary of a correction. Last Monday, Twitter's underwriting banks initiated coverage of the stock, with only two of the five (Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank) meting out a "buy" rating. Two rated it a "hold" (Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase) while Bank of America Merrill Lynch had the temerity to issue a "sell" rating.
That lack of enthusiasm is notable -- even exceptional, perhaps -- for banks that will be vying to do more investment banking business with this high-profile name down the road. At just under $52, Twitter's stock price is above the price target of even the two most optimist of the underwriters (Deutsche Bank's is $50, Goldman's is $46.) When people who sell stocks for a living are bearish -- or even lukewarm -- on an issue, it's no time to be rushing into it.
Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA, has no position in any stocks mentioned; you can follow him on Twitter: @longrunreturns. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Facebook, and Goldman Sachs and owns shares of Apple, Facebook, and JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Does a Strong Start Make 2018 a Sure Winner for Stocks?
Find out whether the so-called "January effect" is real.
Meet the 2018 Dogs of the Dow
Learn the basics of this simple dividend-investing strategy.
The Dow's Worst Day in 2017
Even with big gains, there were some scary times for the average.