One step forward, two steps back. For the second time in just three months, Boeing (NYSE:BA) has lost its chance to ink a multibillion-dollar fighter-jet sale.
In September, if you recall, Boeing had a chance to sell the Republic of Korea $7.7 billion worth of F-15SE Silent Eagle fighter jets. Boeing lost that contest to Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) and its F-35 stealth fighter. As the Koreans explained, Boeing's jet was cheaper, but what they really wanted was the more advanced F-35. And now it seems that Boeing just can't win ...
This week, down in Brazil, Boeing just saw its F/A-18 fighter rejected despite being technologically superior to the winner ... because it cost too much. (Sheesh!)
Price is the object
If you haven't been following this story closely, let me bring you up to date. A few years back, Brazil decided to update its air force of obsolete French Mirage 2000 jets. Brazil wanted more modern fighters, and whittled is shopping list down to just three planes, built by three different defense contractors:
- France's Dassault, which offered the Rafale fighter jet.
- Sweden's Saab, tendering its newest JAS-39 Gripen.
- And Boeing, offering the F/A-18.
Brazil intended to start off the modernization process with an initial buy of three dozen attack jets, at an estimated cost of $7 billion. Further purchases would then continue over the next 15 years, totaling perhaps 100 fighter planes -- and $20 billion -- when all was said and done. This, therefore, was a prize worth fighting for.
And fight they did, with French Dassault playing especially dirty, trading favors with then-Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva to improve its chances of winning the contract. You can read all about the details of the insider dealing here. But basically, France agreed to buy military equipment from Brazilian defense contractor Embraer (NYSE:ERJ), and even back an Olympic Games bid for Rio de Janeiro, if Brazil would choose Dassault's planes over those of Saab and Boeing.
This tangled web of favor-trading turned France's pricey Rafale, reportedly as much as $6.2 billion, plus $4 billion for maintenance contracts over 30 years, into the front-runner to win the contract. This was despite reports that Saab was offering to sell Brazil the Gripen for just $6 billion, maintenance included. Boeing's position, lacking Dassault's political connections and charging $7.7 billion for its plane (also including maintenance), looked tenuous in the extreme.
Then Boeing suffered an even bigger setback when news of the NSA spying scandal broke in August, and Brazil took umbrage at reports that the U.S. had been spying on its electronic communications. As one local official put it, Brazil was unwilling to even "talk about the fighters with Boeing" anymore, after that kerfuffle.
This week, the drama drew to a close, when Brazil confirmed it will pay $4.5 billion, plus the cost of long-term maintenance contracts, to buy 36 Gripens from Saab.
Whether it was Boeing's too-high price tag, or the NSA spying scandal that finally scotched Boeing's bid, we may never know for sure. Probably it was the price. At least, Brazilian daily Folha de Sao Paulo reported that price was the reason Brazil ultimately changed its mind and rejected France's Rafale.
What is clear, though, is that Boeing is rapidly running out of fighter jet contracts to lose -- and that's not good news for the company's $16 billion Military Aircraft business. With Lockheed Martin locking up the high end of the fifth-generation fighter jet market, second-tier planebuilders like Saab, Embraer, and now Textron (NYSE:TXT) sniping at the low end, Boeing's stuck in the middle, fighting for share in a shrinking market -- and more often than not, losing.
Invest ahead of the news
With Brazil's decision made, and so well-publicized, investors are well aware that this is bad news for Boeing and Dassault, and good news for Saab. But not all good news is quite so public. Our top technology analyst recently infiltrated one of Wall Street's most exclusive gatherings and left with three incredible investment opportunities, straight from the CEOs. These are profit-building strategies Main Street isn't meant to hear about -- so you must act now before someone shuts us up. Click if you want "industry insider" earnings -- now!
Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Embraer. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.