Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Oscar Nominations of 2014: The Year of the Contemporary Historical Drama

By Leo Sun – Jan 17, 2014 at 3:06PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The Oscar nominations are in -- and 5 of the 9 films nominated for Best Picture were historical dramas. Is this the start of a new trend in American cinema, and could it be dangerous for filmmakers to blur the lines between fact and fiction?

Films and books are generally categorized as works of fiction or non-fiction.

These days, that line has been increasingly blurred by Oscar-nominated films such as Sony's (SONY 0.84%) Captain Phillips, Comcast (CMCSA 0.34%)/Focus Features' Dallas Buyers Club, Viacom (NASDAQ: VIA)/Paramount's The Wolf of Wall Street, The Weinstein Company's Philomena, and Fox's (FOX) 12 Years a Slave.

Those four films represent varying degrees of fact enhanced by dramatic fiction, and represent the continuing rise of historical fiction in cinema.

Matthew McConaughey's stunning transformation in Dallas Buyers Club could lead to an Oscar. (Source:

In 2012, only two Oscar nominated films, Hugo and Moneyball, fell into this category. Last year, there were three -- Argo, Lincoln, and Zero Dark Thirty. This year, a whopping five out of the nine films nominated for Best Picture are based on true stories.

While some may chalk this up to coincidence, the trend indicates that audiences and critics are developing a taste for dramatized versions of real events, especially more character-centered and contemporary tales.

Let's take a closer look at why contemporary historical dramas have taken center stage this year, the strengths and weaknesses of the genre, and their commercial and critical reception.

How the contemporary historical drama genre came to be

The historical drama genre has evolved significantly over the past few decades.

Films like Ben Hur (1959), Spartacus (1960), Lawrence of Arabia (1962), and Cleopatra (1963) once defined the epic historical drama.

However, the Civil Rights movement and the Vietnam War changed filmmaker's attitudes significantly by the 1970s, coating the once idealist genre with a thick layer of cynicism. Films like All the President's Men (1976), Raid on Entebbe (1977), The Deer Hunter (1978), and Apocalypse Now (1979) all took the genre down a dark road that forced audiences to reflect more thoroughly on contemporary events.

Ben Hur. (Source: Wikimedia)

Today, Captain Phillips, Dallas Buyers Club, The Wolf of Wall Street, Philomena, and 12 Years a Slave can be considered the spiritual descendants of those earlier films -- focusing on the darker side of governments and human nature.

Captain Phillips, in particular, continues down the same road taken by Zero Dark Thirty -- leaving audiences with a nihilistic emptiness at the end, rather than any sense of victory, as the emaciated pirate leader is led away in chains.

These types of films also bear the scars of 9/11 -- the brief resurgence of American idealism seen in the films of the 1990s, such as Forrest Gump (1994), was replaced by sobering films filled with uncomfortable reflections, such as World Trade Center (2006), United 93 (2006), and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2011).

The strengths and weaknesses of the contemporary historical drama

The core problem of the contemporary historical drama is the way it blurs the lines between fact and fiction. By claiming that a film is "based on actual events," creative teams have the freedom to dramatize and change real events as they see fit.

While not much harm was done by fictionalizing events from antiquity, such as the lives of Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, and Cleopatra, mixing fact with fiction in contemporary stories is a more questionable practice.

For example, Zero Dark Thirty featured a female protagonist called Maya, who was responsible for orchestrating the final assault on Bin Laden's compound. However, Maya was a fictional, composite character only partially based on a real-life operative.

Some of this year's nominees follow that path of blending fact with fiction as well.

Captain Phillips. (Source:

Captain Phillips, which was directed by United 93 director Paul Greengrass, has been harshly criticized by the real crew of the Maersk Alabama. According to the crew, the real Captain Phillips "recklessly" ignored warnings and entered pirate-infested waters to shorten the trip and cut costs -- a controversial point that was never addressed in the movie.

Stephen Frears' Philomena has been criticized for its anti-Catholic undertones and a major historical inaccuracy, in which the primary antagonist, Sister Hildegard McNulty, is shown meeting journalist Martin Sixsmith -- which would have been impossible since McNulty died in 1995, nine years before Sixsmith started his investigation.

Meanwhile, Martin Scorsese's The Wolf of Wall Street is based on the memoirs of Jordan Belfort, who is hardly a reliable narrator. The film suffers from the same problems as Blow, Ted Demme's 2001 biopic about cocaine smuggler George Jung. When a real story, already documented by the media, is retold in first person by an unreliable narrator, then subsequently retold by filmmakers, things inevitably get distorted.

Filmmakers will undoubtedly continue to dramatize historical events, but this trend raises interesting questions -- do filmmakers have the responsibility of keeping films, especially those based on recent events, as accurate as possible? Or should they have the creative license to change these stories to enhance their dramatic power?

The business of contemporary historical dramas

It's an established fact that the most critically acclaimed films are not necessarily the most profitable ones. Yet in recent years, filmmakers have proven that achieving both is possible.

The Artist and Argo, which were respectively the Best Pictures of 2011 and 2012, were both box office hits. The Artist grossed $133 million globally on a tiny production budget of $15 million. Argo grossed $232 million on a budget of $44.5 million.

While none of this year's Oscar nominees can match Lionsgate's (LGF-A 1.19%) Hunger Games: Catching Fire, which grossed $848 million worldwide on a budget of $130 million, all of the aforementioned films were profitable while being loved by critics:



Production cost

Global box office

Rotten Tomatoes

Captain Phillips


$55 million

$215 million


Dallas Buyers Club

Focus Features

$5 million

$17 million


The Wolf of Wall Street

Paramount (Viacom)

$100 million

$120 million



The Weinstein Company

$15 million

$59 million


12 Years a Slave

Fox Searchlight

$20 million

$52 million


Sources: Boxofficemojo, Rotten Tomatoes, industry websites.

Captain Phillips and The Wolf of Wall Street, the top performers, were clearly boosted by the appeal of leading actors Tom Hanks and Leonardo DiCaprio.

However, Dallas Buyers Club, Philomena, and 12 Years a Slave also represent incredible returns on their initial investments, with box office totals more than tripling their production budgets.

These films indicate that it doesn't take expensive special effects to make a profitable film -- which means that we could see more of these smaller, intimate films based on contemporary events.

The bottom line

It's important to remember that there are still other great Oscar-nominated films that I didn't mention in this article, such as the low-key sci-fi films Gravity and Her, American Hustle (which was loosely based on the Abscam investigations of the 1970s and 1980s), and Nebraska.

However, the sharp rise of contemporary historical dramas over the past three years deserves to be noticed by movie fans, critics, and investors alike.

What do you think, dear readers? Is this a start of a trend in filmmaking, and more importantly, could it be dangerous to merge fact with fiction? Let me know in the comments section below!

Fool contributor Leo Sun has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. Stock Quote
Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.
Sony Stock Quote
$82.89 (0.84%) $0.69
Comcast Stock Quote
$35.65 (0.34%) $0.12
Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation Class A Stock Quote
Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation Class A
$7.65 (1.19%) $0.09

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 11/28/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.