Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Oil Boom to Cut Shipping Costs

By Shane Blanchard - Feb 20, 2014 at 10:20AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Lower oil prices could cut shipping companies' largest expense.

In my last two articles, I wrote about how the shipping industry might benefit from a free trade agreement between Europe and the U.S., as well as from the expansion of the Panama Canal. In addition to saving on fuel from a shorter route through an expanded Panama Canal, shipping companies may benefit from low oil prices.

Husky Energy Pumpjack in Alberta, Canada. Source: Husky Energy

Increased oil production in North America could help lower fuel costs for shipping companies. One company that could benefit from lower oil prices is Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK -0.19%). Its 2013 revenue was $86 million, and its cost of revenue was $46.5 million; it still suffered a net loss due to other expenses. If you are looking for dividends from this company, you will have to wait. Under the terms of its financing agreement, it is prohibited from paying dividends until after Dec. 31, 2014.

Another shipping company that suffered losses in 2013 is Diana Shipping (DSX -0.19%), which earned $164 million in 2013, with cost of revenue being $85 million. Like Star Bulk, it also suffered a net loss due to other expenses, not the cost of fuel. It earned 40% of its 2012 revenue from just three companies that chartered its ships, which means the loss of just one customer could have a serious impact on its bottom line. However, in 2011 it depended on three companies for 41% of its revenue, and 44% in 2010, so that risk has been reduced somewhat. In 2008, its board voted to suspend dividend payments and has yet to start paying dividends again.

Canada continues to produce more oil. Canada has the third-largest proven oil reserves in the world, and its Saskatchewan province set a record last year, producing 177.9 million barrels of oil. Husky Energy (HUSKF) recently announced plans to drill for oil in two areas of the Saskatchewan, which should produce a total of 20,000 barrels per day. The sites are expected to start producing oil in 2016.

United States
The U.S. continues to produce more oil. According to the International Energy Agency, U.S. oil production increased by 992,000 barrels a day last year, reaching 7.5 million barrels of oil a day. And, last October, the U.S. produced more oil than it imported, which hasn't happened since 1995.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, Mexican oil production declined from 2004 to 2009. Part of the reason for this is that Mexico's state-owned oil company Pemex has had a monopoly on oil production in Mexico for 75 years. Last December, however, Mexico agreed to let private companies in to drill for oil. Russian oil company Lukoil just signed an agreement with Pemex to explore and drill for oil in Mexico.

The increased oil production should help shipping companies cut costs, although one already has its costs under control. Navios Maritime Partners (NYSE: NMM) had revenue of $198 million in 2013, and its cost of revenue was $15 million. It is the only one of the three companies to pay dividends; it has payed regular quarterly dividends since 2008. While it is in less need of lower fuel costs, it should still benefit from them.

Location, location, location
The amount of oil produced is one factor in oil prices; where it is produced is another. North America is a much more stable region than the Middle East, which should reduce the chances of oil prices spiking due to a military conflict. As fuel expense represents 45% to 50% of a ship's operating expense, lower oil prices could save shipping companies a lot of money.

One of the ways shipping companies save on fuel is called "slow steaming," which simply means sailing the ships more slowly to save fuel. If lower fuel prices cause more ships to sail at full speed, it could reduce demand for shipping as more goods could be transported annually with fewer ships. Another risk is that the increased oil production in the U.S. may be short-lived. In Nov. 2013, the International Energy Agency predicted that the U.S. would become the world's top oil producer in 2016, but for only four years.

Shane Blanchard has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Star Bulk Carriers Corp. Stock Quote
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
$25.85 (-0.19%) $0.05
Diana Shipping Inc. Stock Quote
Diana Shipping Inc.
$5.35 (-0.19%) $0.01
Husky Energy Inc. Stock Quote
Husky Energy Inc.

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/17/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.