Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Can BP Crack the Code to Success in U.S. Shale?

By Arjun Sreekumar - Jul 26, 2014 at 11:00AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

BP’s decision to separate its onshore U.S. shale assets into a new business should benefit the company in a number of ways.

BP (BP 1.52%) announced earlier this year that it will separate its onshore US oil and gas assets in the lower 48 states into a new business by next year – a move that reflects the British oil giant's acknowledgement of shale's unique challenges.

By forming this new business, which will have separate governance, processes, and systems, BP should become more competitive against smaller, nimbler energy producers that have dominated US shale drilling in recent years.

Photo credit: Carrizo Oil & Gas

BP separates US shale business
According to BP, the new business will operate independently and will disclose its financial statements separately starting in 2015. While BP will still own the new business, it will be run by a separate management team working from a new location in Houston, instead of BP's North American headquarters at 501 Westlake Park Boulevard in Houston.

BP's chief executive Bob Dudley said the new business will be a "critical part of BP's portfolio over the long-term." Its management team will be tasked with overseeing operations across the company's vast onshore US portfolio, which includes 7.6 billion barrels of reserves spread across 5.5 million acres in Texas and the Mid-Continent.

BP's main areas of focus will be the Eagle Ford, where it held roughly 450,000 gross acres and had nine rigs operating as of year-end 2013, and the Anadarko basin, where it had over 1,000,000 gross acres and 12 rigs operating at year-end 2013. Success in these locations will require an entirely new approach to decision-making and cost management.

Why shale is different
While BP has considerable expertise in offshore deepwater drilling, onshore shale drilling is a different game. Deepwater development focuses on a small number of wells that each contain enormous volumes of hydrocarbons. By contrast, shale development features hundreds and thousands of potential wells that are more evenly distributed.

As such, successful shale development requires the identification of the most productive zones and the most economical methods of developing them, which calls for quick decision-making and exceptional control over costs. By forming a separate business, BP should be able to make quicker decisions, improve its drilling speed, and manage costs better.

Not only would this allow the company to improve its returns and compete more successfully against smaller, nimbler firms, but it would also increase the value of its US shale business in case BP decides to sell it at some point down the line.

Other benefits
Beyond improving competitiveness, BP's decision to separate its US shale business could also pay off in other ways over the long run. As the company improves its shale drilling knowledge and capabilities in the US, it can use that experience to unlock hydrocarbons from shale and tight oil reservoirs in foreign locations such as Russia, Oman, and Algeria.

In an interview with FuelFix, BP's head of technology David Eyton explained how the company's shale ventures in the US could translate into future success abroad: "There's an extraordinary diversity of experiments going on, so the industry as a whole is learning very rapidly, and it's quite cheap to learn in the lower 48 ... It doesn't cost very much to try things out here without losing your shirt. It's like a massive laboratory."

Investor takeaway
BP's decision to separate its US shale segment into a separate business shows that the company is serious about improving its competitiveness in an operating region that has proved hugely challenging for most oil majors. Its emphasis on cost control should help improve returns and make the business more valuable to potential suitors, while also providing knowledge and experience that can be used to develop other shale reservoirs around the world.


Arjun Sreekumar has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

BP p.l.c. Stock Quote
BP p.l.c.
$30.62 (1.52%) $0.46

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/09/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.