It's official now -- SpaceX is a contender.
Last week, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration officially "certified" SpaceX as one of its preferred contractors, allowing the upstart space launch company to bid against the United Launch Alliance (ULA) of Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) on almost every kind of space mission in NASA's inventory. As reported on SpaceflightNow.com, SpaceX will from here on out be able to bid on "medium-risk" missions, including the launching of "most" Earth observation satellites and "many" interplanetary probes aboard SpaceX Falcon 9 lift vehicles.
SpaceX's new "Category 2" certification does not, however, allow the company to bid on any "multibillion-dollar interplanetary flagship missions." (Yet.) For the time being, only ULA, with its Atlas V and Delta II rockets, and Orbital ATK (NYSE:OA), which flies the Pegasus XL rocket, are allowed to bid on such "Category 3" projects.
What's next for SpaceX?
You might expect the answer to this question to be "Category 3, of course!" But in fact, SpaceX has one more trophy to collect before seeking Cat-3 certification from NASA. This one will come from the U.S. Air Force -- and it could be worth even more than NASA's Cat-3 stamp of approval.
As confirmed by the Air Force Times earlier this month, SpaceX is entering the final lap in its race to win Air Force certification to launch some of America's most sensitive spy satellites into orbit. Testifying before Congress last month, Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James confirmed she is confident that SpaceX's Falcon 9 will win certification by June -- in time to compete against ULA for at least two Air Force space launches this year, and more in years to come.
Currently monopolized by ULA, such Air Force "national security" launches are budgeted to cost taxpayers about $7.1 billion this year. That's a multibillion-dollar opportunity for the privately owned space exploration company.
What does it mean for investors?
By the same token, though, it's a multibillion-dollar risk for publicly traded Boeing and Lockheed Martin, the owners of ULA. At present, ULA is under contract to build and launch some 78 rocket cores carrying national security payloads for the Air Force -- $17.6 billion worth of work. The problem is, while ULA has these revenues "in the bag," its ability to compete for future Air Force work is anything but certain.
As we discussed earlier this year, issues with ULA's reliance on Russian RD-180 rocket engines to get its big Atlas V rocket into orbit -- and issues with the cost of the company's Delta rockets -- pose real problems for ULA. On one hand, SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets are cheaper to operate than anything ULA can offer the Air Force, making it hard for ULA to compete on price. On the other hand, if Congressional rules against using Russian rocket engines for national security launches are implemented, ULA may soon be unable to bid on such launches at all.
The upshot for investors: Up until now, ULA has managed to sidestep this risk for the simple reason that it was the only space launch company certified to run national security launches for the Air Force. Next month, that all changes when ULA begins facing competition from SpaceX.
For the time being, ULA CEO Tory Bruno says he's "not the least bit afraid of competition," according to Reuters.
What we'll really want to see, though, is how ULA reacts -- and what effect its reaction has on Boeing's and Lockheed's profits -- after ULA loses its first Air Force contract to SpaceX.
That's when things will really get interesting. That's when SpaceX's "certification" will finally feel real.
Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 359 out of more than 75,000 rated members.
The Motley Fool recommends Orbital ATK. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.