Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

No, Facebook, Inc. Will Not Begin Charging to Keep Pages Private

By Daniel Sparks - Sep 30, 2015 at 8:45AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The rumors are back. And they are as false as ever.

Maybe the rumors are destined to make rounds at least once a year. Or maybe they will eventually taper off for good. Either way, they are back again. Paragraph-long posts in the Facebook (FB 1.41%) News Feed purportedly aimed at protecting users from an upcoming requirement to pay to keep their profiles private are circulating rapidly. But just as the rumors were false last year, they are again false this year. Indeed, even the hoaxes are the same again -- word for word.

The rumors
"Now it's official! It has been published in the media," begins a hoax going around on Facebook. "Facebook has just released the entry price: £5.99 ($9.10) to keep the subscription of your status to be set to 'private.'" 

The hoax continues to advise users to copy and paste this message to their page in order for Facebook to be exempt from paying.

Another similar status going around like wildfire in recent weeks advises users to post a legally binding status update on their page to dodge Facebook's efforts to make their information public.

"If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be [tacitly] allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates," the hoax threatens.

Both of these viral rumors are false.

The social network's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities explains the company's approach to privacy. 

"You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings," Facebook asserts.

For instance, while Facebook policies state users give the social network permission to use photos and videos, the social network also says the permission is subject to a users specified privacy and application settings.

In short, users have control of how the information and content they post on Facebook is shared.

Reviewing Facebook's business model
With these rumors circulating, it's a good time for users and investors to review Facebook's underlying business model, and why the company is an advocate of offering the service for free.

The ongoing difference in Apple's product-focused business model and Facebook's ad-supported model gives insight into the company's preference for free versus a paid service.

"A few years ago, users of Internet services began to realize that when an online service is free, you're not the customer. You're the product," Apple CEO Tim Cook wrote last year in a letter on the company's privacy website. The letter was clearly aimed at companies such as Google and Facebook, both of which make the majority of their revenue and net income from advertising fees.

The letter continued:

But at Apple, we believe a great customer experience shouldn't come at the expense of your privacy. 

Our business model is very straightforward: We sell great products. We don't build a profile based on your email content or web browsing habits to sell to advertisers. We don't "monetize" the information you store on your iPhone or in iCloud. And we don't read your email or your messages to get information to market to you. Our software and services are designed to make our devices better. Plain and simple.

Apple can take stances like this because its business doesn't depend on advertising. The majority of Apple's profits are derived from markups on its products.

But there is a positive case for the flip side of the coin, and Zuckerberg outlined it eloquently in an interview in Time magazine last year:

A frustration I have is that a lot of people increasingly seem to equate an advertising business model with somehow being out of alignment with your customers. I think it's the most ridiculous concept. What, you think because you're paying Apple that you're somehow in alignment with them? If you were in alignment with them, then they'd make their products a lot cheaper!

In short, Facebook values both privacy and free. These rumors, therefore, couldn't be further from reality. While the company could, at some point, introduce some version of a paid service, it wouldn't be one that would threaten to make user information public if users don't pay a monthly fee.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Meta Platforms, Inc. Stock Quote
Meta Platforms, Inc.
$183.83 (1.41%) $2.55

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 05/26/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.