Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Lockheed Looks to Eliminate Northrop Grumman's Lead in Drones

By Rich Smith - May 2, 2016 at 4:13PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Combat-capable drones have been proven aircraft-carrier compatible. Now the Pentagon wonders: Where do we go from here?

The U.S. Navy spent $744 million to develop and build its two Northrop Grumman (NOC 0.67%) X-47B unmanned combat air system-demonstrators (stealthy, carrier-launched drones). Then it consigned the program to the scrap heap.


Northrop Grumman's X-47B program was all ready to take off -- then it got canceled. Image source: Northrop Grumman.

In their place, the Navy now wants to build not just two, but potentially a whole fleet of carrier-launched drones capable of conducting aerial refueling (and maybe doing a bit of surveillance work on the side) for its piloted fighter jets. Initially dubbed the "Carrier Based Aerial Refueling System," or CBARS, the Pentagon recently renamed the as-yet-nonexistent drone aircraft MQ-XX Stingray.

The "M" means multirole. The "Q" designates that it's a drone. And the double-Xes remain to be filled in later. But who will do the filling in?

Will Stingray get a stinger?
Northrop Grumman, once the odds-on favorite to build any combat drone for the Navy following its successful tests of the X-47B, is getting some competition as the UCAS program evolves. As USNI News, the publishing arm of the U.S. Naval Institute, explains, there's a fierce debate going on within the Navy. Forward thinkers advocate building the Stingray as a stealthy, long-range strike drone, armed to the teeth with bombs and missiles, and capable of going places the Navy's F/A-18 fighter-bombers cannot.

More cautious sorts, such as Director of Air Warfare Rear Adm. Mike Manazir,  prefer to relegate drones to a supporting role -- essentially, flying gas stations for fighter jocks -- at least initially.

We've got an idea!
One prominent voice supporting the strike option is Northrop rival Lockheed Martin (LMT 0.05%), which last month came out in favor of designing the Stingray to take on all three of the roles discussed above (tanker, ISR platform, and strike jet). Designing the Stingray as a stealth flying wing, says Lockheed, wouldn't prevent it from being loaded up with aviation fuel and sensors, should the Navy go the more conservative route. On the other hand, should the Navy later prefer an armed Stingray, then the flying wing is stealthier. Gas tanks can be replaced with bomb bays, radar-absorbing coatings applied, and voila -- a stealth combat drone.

Granted, as the maker of both the stealthy F-22 Raptor and the stealthy F-35 Lightning II, Lockheed Martin is somewhat biased toward the stealth option. But Northrop Grumman, too, designed X-47B as a flying wing, and presumably prefers stealth as well.

However, two other likely rivals for a drone tanker contract, Boeing (BA -1.98%) and privately held General Atomics, both argue in favor of more traditional (and less stealthy), potentially cheaper "wing-body-tail" designs for Stingray.

What comes next?
A cautious and cash-constrained Pentagon is likely to give Boeing's and GA's ideas a close hearing when it begins preliminary polling of defense contractors about their ideas for the Stingray later this year. On the other hand, Lockheed Martin (and presumably Northrop Grumman as well) believe that "flying wing" does not necessarily equal "expensive." They'll be making a case for a more robust and evolvable design for the drone.

Which argument wins out (and which defense contractors win contracts) could be decided relatively soon. After sounding out its suppliers later this year, the Pentagon plans to issue an official request for proposals to build the Stingray in 2017, award a contract in 2018 -- and begin first deployment around 2025.

By then, analysts estimate that the annual market for militarized drones could surpass $10 billion -- and Stingrays could make up a good chunk of that.


The X-47B is flying off into the sunset. And now we wonder: What comes next? Image source: Northrop Grumman.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Lockheed Martin Corporation Stock Quote
Lockheed Martin Corporation
LMT
$419.25 (0.05%) $0.21
Northrop Grumman Corporation Stock Quote
Northrop Grumman Corporation
NOC
$466.82 (0.67%) $3.12
The Boeing Company Stock Quote
The Boeing Company
BA
$138.72 (-1.98%) $-2.81

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
336%
 
S&P 500 Returns
115%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 06/28/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.