It's official: Denmark is buying new fighter jets -- and Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) will build them.
For more than a decade now , Denmark's politicians have hemmed and hawed over which plane to pick to replace the country's aging fleet of F-16 Falcon fighter jets. With Denmark one of the nine countries that originally signed up to help design and build Lockheed Martin's vaunted F-35 stealth fighter jet, you might have thought that would be an easy decision to make.
Nonetheless, after getting a gander at the F-35's gold-plated price tag, Denmark apparently had second thoughts, and insisted Lockheed fly head-to-head against Boeing (NYSE:BA) which offered its F/A-18 Super Hornet as an option, and Eurofighter, which offered the Typhoon, to win Denmark's business. That competition has finally wrapped up, however, and the results are in: Lockheed wins.
A win for Lockheed Martin
Last week, in a joint announcement by the Danish Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Denmark confirmed that Lockheed Martin has won the competition. Just as soon as Parliament OKs the purchase, the Royal Danish Air Force will start the process of acquiring 27 F-35A fighter jets. The cost, estimated at $4.5 billion, will be worth more than 9% of annual revenue to Lockheed Martin.
That's of course grand news for Lockheed Martin. Combined with recent news that the company has driven down the price tag on its F-35s to less than $100 million (for U.S. buyers, at least), it looks like the F-35 is getting some lift beneath its wings again. And with 27 new planes among which to spread out development costs, the F-35 will likely get incrementally cheaper for future buyers.
A win for the F-35
In the course of evaluating its various options, Denmark concluded that the F-35 offers superior "survivability" relative to either the Boeing F/A-18 or the Eurofighter Typhoon. The Danes found the F-35 to be more "mission effective," and said it has more future development potential as well.
Of course, as I said, Denmark was not without a dog in this fight. The country's taxpayers helped to develop the F-35, and according to the analysts at Defense-Update.com, Denmark contributed $291 million to the airplane's development costs. When all was said and done, it's not too terribly surprising to learn that Denmark chose the F-35 on its qualitative merits -- but here's something that may surprise you...
They decided the F-35 is actually cheaper than the competition, too.
For an aircraft that's been so heavily reported to cost $1.5 trillion, that's a pretty astonishing conclusion. But the well-known $1.5 trillion figure refers to the entire cost of buying and maintaining some 3,100 F-35 fighter jets, in all three configurations, over a period of 60 years. When Denmark was evaluating the plane's cost (and those of its rivals), they did so in the context of what it would cost to buy a set number of aircraft and operate them for a term of 30 years. What you see above is what Denmark concluded those costs would be, per plane .
And as you can see, they found the F-35 to be cheaper than any alternative.
What it means for investors
Is Denmark right about the F-35 being cheaper than the Boeing F/A-18 and the Eurofighter Typhoon? That remains to be seen. (Ask me again in 30 or 60 years.) What's important right now is that in a head-to-head competition, Denmark has concluded that the F-35 is the cheapest plane of the three -- and as the only fifth-generation combat jet in a field of fourth-gen warbirds, the best-quality plane as well.
That's a big vote of confidence in the F-35, and one that should go a long way toward reassuring future buyers of the aircraft. It's a rare bit of good news for Lockheed Martin investors as well.
Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on Motley Fool CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 299 out of more than 75,000 rated members.
The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.