Yesterday, OSI Pharmaceuticals
There's a reason that OSI's stock took such a hit. This deal, at this price, is lousy. It is quite possibly the worst buyout I've ever seen. I cannot believe that OSI is paying this much for Eyetech.
The skinny on OSI
During yesterday's conference call, Colin Goddard, CEO of OSI Pharmaceuticals, gave some sound strategic justifications for the purchase. He wants to transition OSI into a multiproduct company and move it beyond Tarceva, a cancer drug (and its lone product) that it shares with biotech titan Genentech
I can buy that argument. I like companies with broad portfolios. Even blockbuster drugs level out eventually, and you'll often see a company become successful with one big product but have trouble coming up with a second act to keep growth in track.
So I understand why OSI wants to bring in some more drugs. We're cool there. But why Eyetech? And why $935 million?
The skinny on Eyetech
Eyetech is bringing its age-related macular degeneration drug Macugen to the table . and not much else. Macugen is a relatively new drug -- it launched in late 2004. It did $50 million in sales for the second quarter. The drug is doing well thus far, and Eyetech expects net product revenue from the sale of Macugen to come in at just less than $200 million for all of 2005.
But there are two problems here. First, while Macugen has performed well so far, Eyetech shares the proceeds with Pfizer
The second problem is that Macugen has done well because it is a first mover. Other competitors are breathing down its neck. They include Lucentis from Genentech and Evizon from Genaera
Foolish final thoughts
Considering that Macugen is a huge risk and that the proceeds it does generate are shared with Pfizer, is it really worth almost a billion dollars?
I don't think so. And given the market's reaction yesterday, I'd say that's the consensus view.
I really have no idea what OSI is thinking. OSI has done well with Tarceva, and the drug should drive top-line growth for years to come. The company also has a number of interesting oncology and diabetes drugs in development that could drive future growth.
Although in principle I support OSI's acquisitive mood, there is no reason why it should have strayed from its circle of competence. Instead of bringing in drugs that mesh with its core competency, it's overpaying for a drug outside its therapeutic focus that will soon come under serious competitive pressure. This acquisition seems like a huge blunder.
Charly Travers is the Motley Fool Rule Breakers biotech analyst. Take a free 30-day trial to Rule Breakers byclicking here. Charly does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. The Fool has a strictdisclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Why BlackBerry Is a Buy Heading Into Q3 Earnings
BlackBerry should report another round of improvements in software revenue and margin.
Twitter Stock Pops to Fresh 52-Week High on Analyst Upgrade and Expanded Harassment Policies
The microblogging service gets a bullish vote from Wall Street, while attempting (again) to crack down on hate on its platform.
Can The Trade Desk Keep Going After Last Week's 10% Pop?
The programmatic advertising leader moves higher after an opportunistic SunTrust analyst upgrade.