*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.
Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
Rare earth exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer investors a way to gain exposure to several major themes at once, including national security, supply chain resilience, electrification, and advanced technology.
Rare earth elements play a critical role in products ranging from electric vehicle motors and wind turbines to smartphones, semiconductors, defense systems, and precision-guided weapons. Metals such as neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and europium are difficult to replace in many high-performance applications.
That has made control of rare earth supply chains an increasingly important geopolitical issue. One reason is that global production remains highly concentrated. China continues to dominate rare earth mining, processing, and refining capacity, while many Western countries remain heavily dependent on imports.
At the same time, investing directly in individual rare earth companies can be challenging. Many are small, cyclical businesses exposed to commodity prices, permitting risk, operational issues, and geopolitical developments.
A rare earth ETF can help reduce some of that company-specific risk by providing diversified exposure across multiple firms in the industry. However, beginner investors should exercise caution and do their research, as this ETF segment tends to come with higher fees and greater volatility.
The rare earth ETF space remains relatively nascent. Investors currently have only a handful of pure-play U.S.-listed options to choose from, and each comes with trade-offs. You may notice that some of these ETFs have relatively modest assets under management, which can increase the risk of fund closures. Fees also tend to be higher than those of broad market ETFs, creating additional drag on long-term returns.
Investors should also remember that many of the underlying companies are international mining businesses. In extreme geopolitical scenarios, sanctions or market restrictions could affect certain holdings. Finally, rare earth companies are often cyclical commodity producers, and some may not yet be consistently profitable, making the space inherently more speculative than a traditional broad-market index fund.
Benefits
Risks
Rare earth ETFs can make sense for investors with a specific thesis on supply chains, geopolitics, electrification, defense spending, or the growing demand for critical minerals. They provide a more diversified way to express that view than buying a single mining company and hoping it becomes a winner.
At the same time, investors should be careful not to let headlines drive the investment decision. Rare earths have become a popular topic because they sit at the intersection of several powerful narratives, but a good story does not always translate into good investment returns. Much of the future demand growth is already widely discussed and followed by the market.
For that reason, rare earth ETFs are often best viewed as a satellite position rather than a core holding. Investors who believe in the long-term theme may allocate a modest portion of their portfolio to the space while keeping the bulk of their assets in more diversified funds. That approach allows participation in the potential upside without becoming overly dependent on a narrow and volatile corner of the market.
Ultimately, the best rare earth ETF depends on what risk you are trying to manage. Some investors may prioritize size and liquidity, others may want to reduce exposure to China, while others may prefer broader exposure to critical minerals. Understanding those differences is often more important than simply chasing whichever fund has performed best recently.
The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX -4.46%) is the largest rare earth ETF, with about $3.1 billion in assets under management as of mid-2026. The ETF passively tracks the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index and holds a portfolio of producers, refiners, and recyclers, primarily in the mining sector.
Geographically, the portfolio reflects the realities of the global rare earth supply chain. China accounts for approximately 27% of assets, followed closely by Australia at 26%, due to the country's extensive mining industry and rare earth deposits. The United States accounts for roughly 20% of the portfolio, while Canada rounds out the largest country allocations at about 12%.
Investors should expect a risk profile materially different from that of a broad-market ETF. Only about half of the portfolio is invested in large-cap companies with market capitalizations above $10 billion. Another 27% is allocated to mid-cap stocks between $2 billion and $10 billion, while roughly 22% is invested in small-cap companies valued below $2 billion.
Volatility is correspondingly high. Over the trailing three-year period, the ETF has posted a standard deviation of 38.38%, indicating the potential for significant swings in either direction. While some underlying companies pay dividends, income is not a major attraction. After accounting for the ETF's 0.53% expense ratio, investors currently receive a 30-day SEC yield of 0.13%.
| Current price |
|---|
| $73.23 |
| $16.98 |
| $26.29 |
The Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART -2.89%) is the smallest of the three major rare earth ETFs. Despite launching in January 2022, the fund has struggled to gain significant scale and currently manages approximately $47.03 million in assets. It charges a 0.59% expense ratio, placing it between the VanEck and Sprott offerings on cost.
Unlike the other two funds, EART takes a broader view of the critical materials ecosystem. The ETF tracks an index of approximately 50 companies across zinc, platinum, palladium, nickel, magnesium, lithium, graphene, graphite, cobalt, copper, carbon fiber, and other strategic materials. As a result, investors gain exposure to a broader range of commodities beyond traditional rare earth elements.
As expected, the portfolio remains heavily concentrated in mining and materials companies. China is the largest country allocation at 26.7%, followed by the United States at 18.5%. However, the geographic profile differs significantly from that of the other funds. The United Kingdom accounts for roughly 14% of assets, South Africa about 13%, while Australia does not appear until fifth place at approximately 10%.
The United States imports nearly all of the rare earth materials it consumes, and a substantial portion of those imports ultimately trace back to China. Given that U.S.-China relations have periodically been strained by trade disputes, export controls, and broader geopolitical tensions, some investors are uncomfortable with having significant Chinese exposure in a rare earth portfolio.
While an outright investment ban remains unlikely, investors have seen how geopolitical events can affect markets. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, many Russian equity ETFs became effectively uninvestable after sanctions and trading restrictions were imposed. The Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC -5.32%) was created partly to address similar concerns by eliminating all Chinese exposure.
The ETF is a relatively new entrant with approximately $54.5 million in assets under management and a relatively high 0.65% expense ratio. In exchange, investors receive a portfolio free of Chinese holdings. Australia represents the largest country allocation at roughly 47%, followed by the United States at 41%.
The portfolio is also somewhat more concentrated, holding just 31 companies. Investors should note that the strategy leans further down the market-cap spectrum than REMX. Approximately 45% of the portfolio is invested in small-cap companies with market capitalizations below $2 billion, increasing both potential upside and risk.
