Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Seeking the King of the Oil Sands

By Toby Shute - Updated Apr 6, 2017 at 12:25PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

This Peters report reaffirms our top sector picks.

Back in February, the folks at Macquarie gave us a rundown on all things oil sands, including the research shop's estimates for breakeven costs, what factors are most critical to a low-cost operation, and who the sector's standouts are.

This week, another top shop is out with an updated spin on the oil sands. This is pretty timely, following the year's biggest IPO, not to mention China Petroleum & Chemical Corp's proposed purchase of ConocoPhillips' (NYSE: COP) 9% Syncrude stake.

Calgary-based Peters & Co. estimates that oil sands projects employing steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology to produce bitumen need $55 per barrel to break even. That's up from a previous estimate of $50, reflecting higher average costs than the company had previously modeled. Macquarie pegged breakeven (defined as a 10% after-tax rate of return) at a slightly higher $61 per barrel in its February report.

Whether Peters or Macquarie has the better break-even estimate, SAGD economics look very attractive at today's oil prices. Of course, that's only on average. Some projects, like Nexen's (NYSE: NXY) Long Lake play, are not faring particularly well. Investors need to focus on the best-in-class operators here.

As discussed in the Macquarie report, Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN), Cenovus Energy (NYSE: CVE), and Suncor Energy (NYSE: SU) are some of the lowest-cost oil sands players. The Peters crew concurs with those picks, and adds Imperial Oil (AMEX: IMO) as another efficient operator for investors to consider.

Imperial has been active in the space for decades, with pilot production at Cold Lake tracing back to the mid-1960s. Imperial developed the cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process, a SAGD alternative under the right conditions, in-house, and has used it to pump more than 1 billion barrels of bitumen out of the ground.

This is another strong name in the space, though you should be aware that a significant portion of Imperial's future growth will come from the Kearl project, an open pit mining joint venture with ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM). If, like me, you're more keen on SAGD, you might prefer to keep your focus on Cenovus.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Imperial Oil Limited Stock Quote
Imperial Oil Limited
$44.54 (-5.62%) $-2.65
Exxon Mobil Corporation Stock Quote
Exxon Mobil Corporation
$84.81 (-3.13%) $-2.74
Suncor Energy Inc. Stock Quote
Suncor Energy Inc.
$33.23 (-6.58%) $-2.34
ConocoPhillips Stock Quote
$84.64 (-6.97%) $-6.34
Devon Energy Corporation Stock Quote
Devon Energy Corporation
$51.89 (-5.84%) $-3.22

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 07/06/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.