At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.
But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.
Wake up and smell the tobacco
September was a rough month for tobacco investors, as Stifel Nicolaus took a final puff, then stubbed out its "buy" ratings on Altria
Good question. Problem is, not a single major news outlet has published details on the analyst's upgrade (although enough of them have confirmed it happened that we can at least be sure of that much.) So really, your guess is as good as mine on this one. ... But fortunately, I've got a pretty good idea what it is CS likes about PM: the price.
An addictive investment
Granted, selling for nearly 16 times earnings, international-operator Philip Morris costs a lot more than its domestic U.S. peers, with the exception of Reynolds American
- Priced at just 13.4 times FCF.
- Growing at a brisk, 11% annual clip for the next five years.
- Paying a sturdy 4.4% dividend.
While shares aren't quite as intoxicating a value as they were when I suggested buying them last month, they're still a relative bargain.
Profits so good, it's almost sinful
Now, I readily acknowledge that some investors turn up their nose at tobacco stocks. And if you have moral qualms about investing in Philip Morris, then don't. On the other hand, many of the same folks who diss the company as immoral are quite ready and willing to profit from other companies that market to our weaker natures. According to scientific studies, the foodstuffs sold by food and beverage companies such as McDonald's
Me, I'm a laissez-faire kind of an investor. As such, I'm more interested in knowing whether an investment will pay off, and less in the surgeon general's opinion of it. And in this regard, I have to say that Credit Suisse's record of investing in "sin stocks" is nothing short of commendable. Historically, its tobacco picks have outperformed the market.
More recently, its active recommendations of junk-food purveyors McDonald's and PepsiCo are both up strongly, alongside strong results elsewhere among restaurants and beverages companies. And while Credit Suisse's Coke picked hasn't yet popped, it's more than made up the difference with bottler Coca-Cola Enterprises:
CS's Picks Beating
|Coca-Cola Enterprises||Outperform||***||76 points|
Between Credit Suisse's record of investing in sin stocks, and my own disinterested examination of Philip Morris' financials, I have to say: I love the smell of tobacco this morning.
Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find Rich on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 604 out of more than 170,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Philip Morris International is a Motley Fool Global Gains choice. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are Motley Fool Income Investor picks. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on PepsiCo. The Fool owns shares of Altria Group, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International.
True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community.