Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insider Trading on Capitol Hill?

By Selena Maranjian – Updated Nov 16, 2016 at 4:30PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Are some of our senators taking advantage of their inside scoop?

Few of us have probably ever looked forward with great anticipation to the publication of an article in a financial academic journal. But there's one appearing in the December issue of the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis that may make for gripping reading. It raises a troubling question: Are there financial shenanigans going on on Capitol Hill? Specifically, are (some) senators engaging in insider trading, acting on early knowledge they may have regarding what legislation will be passed when, which companies will be awarded big contracts, and which companies' drugs will be approved?

A Wall Street Journal article last month addressed the forthcoming report, saying, "A study suggests that U.S. senators possess stock-picking skills that even the most seasoned money manager would envy. During the boom years of the 1990s, senators' stock picks beat the market by 12 percentage points a year on average, according to the study. Corporate insiders, meanwhile, beat the market by about six percentage points a year, while U.S. households underperformed the market by 1.4 percentage points a year on average, according to separate studies."

It went on to note, "Looking at the timing of cumulative returns, the senators also appeared to know exactly when to buy or sell their holdings. Senators would buy stocks just before the shares suddenly would outperform the market by more than 25% [and would sell with similar prescient timing]. What explains this miraculous performance? Given that the senators are producing returns that best even such stars as Peter Lynch and [Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE:BRK.A, BRK.B)] Warren Buffett, shouldn't they go manage mutual funds instead of running the country?"

Something sure looks fishy, doesn't it? But it appears that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which saw no reason not to go after Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia's (NYSE:MSO) leading lady over less than $100,000 in gains, isn't interested in what might be going on in the Senate. Hmm. could it be that the SEC, which has personnel and budgets approved by senators, doesn't want to bite the hands that feed it?

Stay tuned for more details and developments, fellow investors! And in the meantime, feel free to share your thoughts on our discussion boards. We're offering a free 30-day trial of all of them right now.

Here are some more Fool articles touching on Congress:

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway.

None

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Stock Quote
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
MSO.DL

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
340%
 
S&P 500 Returns
106%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 10/20/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.