At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.
But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.
And speaking of the best ...
Three-time Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation Ctrip.com
So what?
If you read my column on Human Genome Sciences yesterday, that might very well be your reaction to news of a Piper endorsement. Why dance to the tune of an investment banker that I just finished describing as "less impressive ... getting significantly more picks wrong than right"?
After all, as of today, Piper scores only a middling 70.97 CAPS rating, and has less than 44% accuracy. Nor is Piper one of those idiot savants that does one thing well while screwing up everything else. Check out its record on Chinese stocks in particular, and you'll find:
Company |
Piper Said: |
CAPS Says (Out of 5): |
Piper's Pick Beating S&P by: |
---|---|---|---|
Baidu.com |
Outperform |
** |
61 points |
Shanda Interactive |
Outperform |
**** |
22 points |
Which is all well and good until you see that Piper also picked:
Company |
Piper Said: |
CAPS Says: |
Piper's Pick Lagging S&P by: |
---|---|---|---|
Yingli Green Energy |
Outperform |
*** |
29 points |
China
Digital TV |
Outperform |
*** |
22 points |
Fushi Copperweld |
Outperform |
*** |
12 points |
New Oriental Education |
Outperform |
**** |
7 points |
Long story short, this banker's record is as middling in the Middle Kingdom as anywhere else. So should you listen to Piper when it endorses Ctrip.com today? Especially when you know that this is a stock that the Fool itself has blessed three times, with superb results for our Hidden Gems members?
Absolutely not
Sure, Ctrip has performed admirably. It's returned an average of 202% profits per pick on three separate occasions for Hidden Gems subscribers. And sure, it's a great company -- but the price ain't.
The way I look at things, Ctrip earned $21 million in the first half of this year, which is up by almost half from what the firm earned in the first half of 2006. But when you turn to Ctrip's free cash flow (FCF), the trip you're taking takes a dark turn. The $11.6 million Ctrip generated in FCF during the first half of 2007 was less than it earned in the first half of 2006. And the $34.8 million it generated all of last year, if repeated in February, would give this company a price-to-free cash flow ratio of 96 -- much too high even for a 36%-per-year grower.
Foolish takeaway
Ctrip was a great idea, and it was a great opportunity for investors when we recommended it the first time, the second time, and the third time. But there's a reason no one says "the fourth time is the charm." This idea is played out, Fools, and it's time to put Ctrip back on the shelf until the price has cooled down some. Don't smoke this pipe. Sell Ctrip.