We at The Motley Fool have tried to get across many different messages to individual investors over the years -- you can beat the market by yourself, Wall Street is not your friend, and so on. Another of those important messages is that P/Es and PEG ratios don't always tell the whole story: Sometimes stocks look "cheap" for a very good reason and aren't in fact cheap at all.
So it was with this in mind that I tackled SYNNEX's
Sales for the quarter were up 11%, with revenue in the IT distribution business up 15% and revenue in the small contract assembly business basically flat. Margins were a bit softer this period, though, and the company's operating income grew at just a 6% clip compared with last year. While reported income from continuing operations was down 17%, the discrepancy comes from financing expenses and a higher tax rate.
This is something of a good news/bad news story. While SYNNEX has pretty respectable margins relative to industry peers, an operating margin of just 1.5% is perilously thin. Similarly, while demand for IT in general is apt to remain pretty robust, quarter-to-quarter spending can be affected by short-term economic concerns and product introductions (like, perhaps, the new operating system from Microsoft
Valuation is where this story gets a little more interesting. First, let's dismiss that P/E and PEG stuff right off the bat -- I'm no great fan of them because earnings can be fictionalized by weird accounting rules, and PEG sometimes seems to me to be a comparison of accounting weirdness (the P/E part) and barely-thought-out guesswork from junior analysts (the G part).
On a cash-flow approach, the stock looks like it could be worth at least 15% more without any particularly heroic assumptions. Now, that doesn't leave much margin of safety relative to today's price, but SYNNEX's higher-than-normal return on capital may give some investors reason to accept a smaller-than-normal cushion to fair value. Do your own due diligence and you may (or may not) find that SYNNEX is a value. But that determination shouldn't have much to do with a single, flawed ratio like the P/E.
For more Foolishness:
Fool contributor Stephen Simpson has no financial interest in any stocks mentioned (that means he's neither long nor short the shares).
More from The Motley Fool
Most Americans Made Poor Financial Decisions This Holiday Season
Were you one of them?
4 Ways to Save More in Your 401(k) in 2018
Annual 401(k) contribution limits are going up next year, and it pays to take advantage.
How 1 Senator Got a Bigger Tax Break for Families
Pressure led to an increase in a key tax credit. Find out more about it here.