So Chuck and I both agree that Cisco
But then we get into an argument over valuation. Chuck sees a single quarter of weakness in the core American router market and concludes that this is the reason for a P/E ratio of less than 23. If so, then Mr. Market owns a working crystal ball. Cisco's P/E has dipped below 23 at some point in four of the past eight quarters. That history stretches back far beyond the current credit crunch that purportedly forces customers such as Disney
Even if you take the lending tightness at face value and see it hurting Cisco's business today, it's just a small bump in the road for Cisco. The company is managed for long-term excellence, and the top brass pays little attention to near-term blips like this one. So AT&T
My esteemed opponent also worries about a very low retained earnings balance on Cisco's balance sheet. He seems to forget that this company wheels and deals with the best of them. If it hadn't been for a slew of major acquisitions over the past three years, Cisco could have held $10 billion in reserves, just like Chuck's spendthrift hero Apple
So the choice is yours -- invest in an undisputed market leader with a long-term focus and a willingness to invest in its future, all at historically tempting prices. Or don't. Just don't come back later and complain about missed opportunities.
Further Foolishness:
You're not done with this duel yet! Read the other three arguments, sound off at Motley Fool CAPS, and vote for a winner.