OK, so most of you don't agree that social networker Facebook is worth $15 billion. So be it. I may, indeed, be wrong.
But I'm encouraged by the results of a new study from Microsoft
Digital ad dollars spent through Avenue A | Razorfish reached $735 million in 2007, up 36% from the prior year. Vertical sites accounted for 39% of that total, up from 37% in 2006. A "vertical site" attracts readers purely for its original content -- such as Fool.com. Portals and search engines, by contrast, aggregate information.
But it was the entertainment and community sites -- like Facebook and YouTube, respectively -- that saw the greatest growth among verticals. Each subset improved by more than 50%, to $51.5 million and $55 million, respectively.
Search engines also blossomed, with the likes of Google
Notice anything in the math? Verticals and search engines improved their share by 5% altogether. Portals dropped by the same amount; down from 24% in 2006 to 19% last year.
To me, this all but confirms that a Microsoft deal for Yahoo! would be, at best, ill-advised. Yahoo!'s properties are no longer the go-to spots to reach the digitally hip.
Facebook and MySpace are where it's at now. And while we've no proof that Facebook can produce the sort of revenue a $15 billion valuation would demand, it's become clear that advertisers covet the network it has built. Same with MySpace, LinkedIn, and each of their social-networking peers.
In short: You're yesterday's Internet, Yahoo!. It's Facebook that is the face of the digital future.
Get your clicks with related Foolishness:
-
A Microsoft deal for SAP might not work, either.
-
Google went to Facebook in December.
-
Social networking aided Akamai's year of living profitably.