Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for fee?
Microsoft isn't alone in vying for Yahoo!'s search engine space. Yahoo! tested outsourcing its ad spots to Google
If Microsoft wants to fill that ad space, it'll have to pay up. Microsoft lacks the depth of Google's ad inventory, so it will probably have to offer Yahoo! either a substantial fixed sum or at least 100% of the revenue-sharing action.
Paying up for Yahoo!
For Microsoft's sake, let's hope it doesn't go the route of offering minimum guarantees. Google has lamented offering News Corp.'s
Yahoo! isn't even keeping up with the market. Industry watcher Interactive Advertising Bureau claims that online advertising grew by 26% last year to $21.1 billion. For those scoring at home, Yahoo!'s revenue inched just 8% higher.
Microsoft knows that Yahoo! is an industry laggard. And since Microsoft sells even less online advertising than Yahoo!, it needs to assume that it will fare even worse, at least initially.
As for revenue-sharing, don't laugh at the possibility of Microsoft offering 100% of the pie, if not more. Microsoft needs to treat any ad deal with Yahoo! as a loss leader, in order to both pad its Rolodex of sponsors and keep that real estate out of Google's hands.
Google repaid third-party publishers $1.34 billion of the $1.69 billion it generated by placing its ads on their sites this past quarter. That's a generous 79% cut of the revenue, and it's widely believed that bigger sites like Time Warner's
Yahoo! would obviously be worth a market premium, given its sheer volume of traffic.
This doesn't mean that Yahoo! has to choose between Microsoft and Google for advertising providers. It can continue to serve its own ads. However, impatient shareholders are already rattling the cages. Outsourcing ads would diminish the company's place in search engine marketing, but create huge cost savings and heaps of high-margin revenue-sharing royalties.
Paying up for everyone else
How desperate is Microsoft to become a search-engine powerhouse? Let's just say that it may be willing to pay you for your patronage.
Jellyfish.com, launched two years ago, is a comparison-shopping site that rewards members with cash-back rebates on purchases from commissioned merchants. Microsoft acquired the site last year, getting into the loyalty-shopping business dominated by sites like United Online's
Microsoft hasn't done much with the Jellyfish model thus far, but this morning's Wall Street Journal claims that the software giant is preparing to roll out "Live Search Cashback," according to "people familiar with the company's plan." The move aims to motivate potential shoppers to go through Mr. Softy as a way to get more bang for their bucks.
Microsoft paying for traffic isn't a new concept. Bill Gates suggested making its MSN.com search engine a rewards-based portal three years ago. The idea brought back dot-com bubble images of iWon.com, the search portal -- now part of IAC
Will Live Search Cashback help the company's fledgling Live.com search business? Probably. For Internet users unfamiliar with sites like MyPoints and Fat Wallet, getting a few pennies back on the dollar is better than nothing. That kind of traffic certainly won't help Microsoft overtake Google, but by appealing to folks set on spending money online, Microsoft will be nibbling at a lucrative chunk of Google's traffic.
Either way, it's good to see Microsoft exploring several options to establish itself as a place to go for both advertisers and Web users.
Good luck with that cow, Microsoft. Anything you can do short of calling Google for milking lessons is worth applauding.