Upon the release of its year-end results earlier this week, the oil and gas company raised both its production guidance and its estimated per-well recoveries in the company's Haynesville shale play to 7.5 billion cubic feet equivalent (Bcfe) of gas. The latter revision bumped up the company's estimated Haynesville resource potential by 15%, to 13.7 trillion cubic feet equivalent. Chesapeake Energy
The following day, Petrohawk announced a placement of 22 million shares, which would dilute equity owners by roughly 9% in one fell swoop.
So much for October's declaration of "no current plans or need to access the equity capital markets." "The Hawk" just hocked a loogey in your eye, Fool.
No wonder management struck a defensive tone on its conference call. Regarding 2009 spending, CEO/Chairman Floyd Wilson said, "We're not going to back off from a good business."
I agree that drilling Haynesville wells is a good (but not great) business today. Even though the darn things cost around $10 million each, they're still a good economic bet, thanks to huge initial production rates. But that leads to one of the things that irks me here: Chesapeake recently spoke about modeling 82% first-year decline rates on these monster wells. You would think this extremely front-weighted production would encourage Petrohawk to follow folks such as EOG Resources
Petrohawk's production is hedged to the tune of 60% this year, so the folks at the company aren't completely off their rockers. But the clear choice of growth over per-share value maximization is enough to turn me off -- for good.
More from The Motley Fool
This Natural Gas Play Is Blossoming
From Big Oil to small caps, this promising shale play has lived up to the billing.
Petrohawk's Future Looks Exciting
Second-quarter results and a merger should make investors salivate.
3 Stocks Shaking the Market
These stocks have been looking up over the past month.