In the second-largest merger of biotech drug makers ever after the 2001 combination of Amgen
Each Biogen shareholder will snag 1.15 shares of Idec per Biogen share, giving Idec shareholders 50.5% of the new company and Biogen owners 49.5%. They will own an entity with $1.6 billion in trailing-12-month revenues, $1.5 billion in cash, and shy of $1 billion in mostly Idec debt -- the latter conveniently omitted from the press release.
Founded in 1978, Biogen went public in 1983, and its biggest success to date has been the blockbuster multiple sclerosis treatment Avonex, now nearing the end of patent protection and subject to increasing competition. It pins future hopes on new psoriasis drug Amevive and drug candidate Antegren for multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease.
Idec formed in 1986 and sallied forth with an IPO in 1991 with a cancer focus. Idec shares the revenues -- $1 billion in 2002 -- from hit non-Hodgkins lymphoma monoclonal antibody treatment Rituxan with Genentech
Opportunity for investors?
For a quick take, let's look at Idec and Biogen's returns on invested capital (ROIC). Though still high, they have been declining for the last four years:
Return on Invested Capital:
Year Biogen Idec Amgen PfizerTTM 27% 35% -5% 45% Y1 30% 34% -7% 51%Y2 47% 51% 37% 48%Y3 56% 71% 47% 22%Y4 70% 91% 62% 37%
Declining ROIC usually brings lower valuation multiples, yet both are valued quite highly for growth:
Valuation Measure Biogen Idec FCF change Y1-Y2 -62% -85% Y2-Y3 -27% 184% Y3-Y4 -40% -37% Y4-Y5 80% 1,318% EV/FCF 360 130EV/EBITDA 19 26EV/NOPAT 27 41 P/E 35 42KEY: Y1-Y2 = Most recent year vs. prior year
EV = enterprise value
FCF = free cash flow
EBITDA = earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization
NOPAT = net operating profit after taxes
P/E = price-to-earnings ratio
Compare these numbers with management's glowing predictions for the new company of 15% compound annual revenue growth and 20% compound annual EPS growth, and the companies are currently priced too richly for my blood. That could change if the merger shows signs of management's promised savings -- $300 million through 2007 -- and research synergies that augur more possible reward than what's available at current valuations.
Share your thoughts about the deal with investors interested in biotech on our discussion board !
Find stock ideas off the beaten path with Tom Gardner and your favorite Foolish analysts each month in Motley Fool Hidden Gems .
Writer and Senior Analyst Tom Jacobs regularly covers biotechnology and drugs for Fool.com and writes the monthly investing column for the journal Nature Biotechnology. He owns no stocks mentioned in this Take.