About the Author
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
What's the best place to retire? To answer that question, The Motley Fool surveyed 2,000 retired Americans to understand what matters most in retirement and used those insights to rank the best places to retire across the United States.
Based on the survey results, The Motley Fool identified seven key retirement factors and weighted each according to retiree preferences: quality of life (31%), healthcare access and quality (15%), housing affordability (13%), crime and safety (12%), weather and climate (12%), state and local taxes (11%), and non-housing affordability (6%). These weightings were applied to secondary data from eight public and institutional datasets to calculate a final retirement score for every U.S. county, reflecting real retiree needs and preferences rather than assumptions about where people “should” retire. Counties were excluded if their population was below 40,000, their quality-of-life score was below 35, or their housing affordability score was below 35. The full methodology and data sources are available at the end of the report.
The Motley Fool’s Best Places to Retire list reflects what retirees value most on average, but there’s no single “right” retirement destination for everyone. The best place to retire depends on personal priorities and expected retirement income. For some, that means keeping costs low so that savings and investments in their retirement accounts go further. Others may place more weight on access to amenities or choosing a more expensive location with great weather.
With that in mind, here's The Motley Fool’s Best Places to Retire in the Midwest list.
Quality of life: 53 | Healthcare: 43 | Housing: 61 | Cost of living: 79 | Crime: 78 | Tax: 48 | Climate: 68 | Total retirement score: 58
Cleveland is an affordable city that's rich in culture and history, with a low cost of living and plenty of outdoor activities to enjoy.
Quality of life: 67 | Healthcare: 27 | Housing: 51 | Cost of living: 79 | Crime: 74 | Tax: 39 | Climate: 64 | Total retirement score: 57
Saint Paul is the quieter of the Twin Cities, but it offers plenty of cultural enrichment opportunities as well as riverfront parks and attractive neighborhoods to enjoy.
Quality of life: 54 | Healthcare: 45 | Housing: 55 | Cost of living: 87 | Crime: 72 | Tax: 42 | Climate: 66 | Total retirement score: 57
Great Lakes scenery and historic breweries are Milwaukee's biggest claims to fame, but the walkable city also offers unique attractions like the Harley-Davidson Museum.
Quality of life: 43 | Healthcare: 32 | Housing: 54 | Cost of living: 80 | Crime: 76 | Tax: 66 | Climate: 66 | Total retirement score: 55
Lapeer provides urban/suburban living with low housing costs, access to affordable housing, and a historic downtown.
Quality of life: 43 | Healthcare: 37 | Housing: 57 | Cost of living: 79 | Crime: 78 | Tax: 52 | Climate: 68 | Total retirement score: 54
Lorain has a strong industrial heritage and an enviable location along Lake Erie and offers quick access to Cleveland for an abundance of recreational opportunities.
Quality of life: 56 | Healthcare: 36 | Housing: 52 | Cost of living: 74 | Crime: 76 | Tax: 28 | Climate: 68 | Total retirement score: 54
Chicago is one of the most vibrant cities in the Midwest, with many iconic cultural institutions to enjoy, as well as waterfront recreation and lifelong learning opportunities at major universities.
Quality of life: 40 | Healthcare: 34 | Housing: 57 | Cost of living: 79 | Crime: 76 | Tax: 64 | Climate: 67 | Total retirement score: 54
Port Huron offers the classic comfort of small-town life, with affordable housing and scenic trails, but also adds waterfront attractions and a strong maritime history.
Quality of life: 38 | Healthcare: 34 | Housing: 58 | Cost of living: 82 | Crime: 79 | Tax: 62 | Climate: 68 | Total retirement score: 54
Fort Wayne's downtown revitalization has provided an abundance of new amenities, including retail and dining, to complement cultural institutions like the Fort Wayne Museum of Art.
Quality of life: 57 | Healthcare: 19 | Housing: 48 | Cost of living: 74 | Crime: 74 | Tax: 40 | Climate: 64 | Total retirement score: 52
Minneapolis has something for everyone, from the Walker Art Center for culture aficionados to Lake Harriet, Minnehaha Falls, and an abundance of other urban lakes and parks for outdoor lovers.
Quality of life: 39 | Healthcare: 19 | Housing: 55 | Cost of living: 91 | Crime: 78 | Tax: 63 | Climate: 61 | Total retirement score: 51
The University of North Dakota enriches life in Grand Forks County, providing ample access to cultural opportunities and fostering strong civic engagement in this affordable area.
Quality of life: 41 | Healthcare: 19 | Housing: 49 | Cost of living: 78 | Crime: 76 | Tax: 63 | Climate: 66 | Total retirement score: 51
Oakland County offers an easy drive to Detroit but with a much more suburban environment that includes parks and lakes as well as local upscale shopping and dining options.
Quality of life: 36 | Healthcare: 24 | Housing: 59 | Cost of living: 83 | Crime: 71 | Tax: 53 | Climate: 70 | Total retirement score: 50
Wood County offers small-town charm, a college-town feel thanks to Bowling Green State University, and access to healthcare and other amenities a short drive away in Toledo.
Quality of life: 38 | Healthcare: 31 | Housing: 56 | Cost of living: 76 | Crime: 36 | Tax: 63 | Climate: 72 | Total retirement score: 48
Johnson County is home to the University of Central Missouri, which provides options for lifelong learning and cultural enrichment.
Quality of life: 53 | Healthcare: 13 | Housing: 45 | Cost of living: 50 | Crime: 76 | Tax: 27 | Climate: 68 | Total retirement score: 47
A revitalized downtown in the affordable suburb of Aurora means you don't have to visit nearby Chicago to enjoy dining, cultural activities, and recreation.
Choosing where to retire is a deeply personal decision, but retirees consistently prioritize a few key needs: affordability, safety, access to healthcare, and quality of life.
The Motley Fool’s Best Places to Retire Index combines secondary data about each location with primary data on what retired Americans say matters most when picking where to live.
This hybrid approach creates a ranking that is both data driven and human centered – a methodology built by retirees for retirees.
The Motley Fool surveyed 2,000 retired Americans aged 55 and above in December 2025 via Pollfish and employed a constant-sum approach (100 points), allowing respondents to clearly allocate points across the factors that mattered most to them when choosing a place to retire. Their average point allocations formed the weights given to scores for each retirement-location factor.
Final scores reflect what retirees value most, not what we assume they value.
Scores were computed at both the county and state levels. All data were normalized on a min–max scale before applying survey weights.
Each factor below includes the justification readers care about most: why it matters to retirees.
Why it matters: Aging well requires reliable care, specialists, and strong healthcare outcomes. Healthcare outcomes measure whether people get healthier, live longer, and maintain a good quality of life.
Sources:
Why it matters: Home costs are the No. 1 expense in retirement and drive relocation decisions.
Source: Zillow Home Value Index (October 2025)
Why it matters: Day-to-day expenses – food, transportation, utilities – determine how far savings stretch.
Source: Economic Policy Institute Family Budget Calculator
Why it matters: State and local tax burdens directly affect retirement income sustainability.
Sources:
Why it matters: Retirees seek comfortable climates that support year-round activity.
Source: NOAA NCEI temperature & precipitation averages (2020–2025)
Why it matters: Personal safety ranks as a top emotional and financial priority.
Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer – violent, property, and social offense rates
Retirement isn’t only about saving money, it’s about living well.
We measured features that enable connection, mobility, recreation, and fulfilling lifestyles:
Data sets were spatially aligned to counties and aggregated to states when necessary for consistency and national comparison.
Counties with a quality-of-life score below 35 were excluded.
Counties with a population of less than 40,000 were excluded.