The performance of the U.S. real estate market over the last several decades presents another example of the risk-reward dynamics of the greater fool approach. Average inflation-adjusted U.S. housing prices nearly doubled from 1995 through 2005, according to the Federal Reserve. Homebuyers relying on the greater fool theory likely enjoyed strong returns if they purchased and sold at nearly any time during that period. There were no repercussions for the lack of time and energy spent understanding the fundamentals and intricacies of the real estate market.
However, if U.S. homebuyers purchased at the beginning of 2007 with the expectation that the real estate market's impressive momentum would continue unabated, they would have likely watched their property value plummet. Housing prices began moving lower that year, and ultimately hit a bottom in 2011 before beginning to rebound. The average home price in the U.S. didn't match the high that it hit in early 2007 until 2013. A "greater fool" may have eventually come along, but it took roughly six years on average for that to happen -- and many real estate investors wound up selling properties at substantial losses before a fool could come knocking.