Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Here's Why Apple Inc. Couldn't Redesign the iPhone 8

By Ashraf Eassa - Dec 26, 2017 at 1:34PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Apple had no choice.

In 2017, Apple (AAPL 1.62%) released three new iPhones. The most exciting of the bunch, the iPhone X, represented the first radical redesign of the iPhone form factor in years. It's sleek, sports a high screen-to-body ratio, and includes some nifty facial-recognition technology not found on any other smartphone. 

The iPhone X, however, isn't for everyone. The device starts at $999 for the base model with 64GB of storage and goes all the way to $1,149 for the version with 256GB of storage. 

Apple's iPhone 8 Plus (left) and its iPhone 8 (right).

Image source: Apple.

To address more cost-sensitive buyers, Apple also introduced the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus. These phones included most of the internal technologies found in the iPhone X (e.g., A11 Bionic processor, upgraded wireless capabilities, wireless charging, and so on), but they retained the same basic form factors as their respective predecessors. 

Although some may be tempted to think that Apple didn't totally revamp the form factors of the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus out of laziness, I don't think that's why. 

Apple's backed into a corner

Apple has made it quite clear that it thinks the iPhone X form factor -- a full-face display with a cutout at the top to accommodate the 3D sensing TrueDepth camera -- represents the future of the iPhone. 

In fact, many credible leaks and reports have already said that Apple is planning a lower-cost iPhone, presumably a successor to the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus, with a 6.1-inch liquid crystal display (LCD) that has a TrueDepth camera and a cutout in the display to accommodate it for 2018. 

Apple's iPhone X.

Image source: Apple.

So if that's the future of the iPhone, any form factor change that Apple could've introduced with the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus would've been a short-lived change. 

Moreover, it's hard to imagine what changes Apple could've done while maintaining the same screen sizes and resolutions. Any changes in either would create extra work for developers -- work that they're not going to want to do for a one-off form factor. 

Apple seems to value symmetry in its designs, so shrinking the top and bottom bezels would've been difficult since Apple needs ample space on the bottom bezel to accommodate the current Touch ID/home button implementation. 

Apple could've potentially shrunken the side bezels of the devices to slightly improve screen-to-body ratio compared with the iPhone 6, 6s, and 7 Plus generation of devices. However, I think Apple's designers consciously and carefully chose those side bezel sizes and hasn't shrunken them because that's the vision that the designers had in mind for those products. 

So, in a nutshell, Apple had two choices: Let the familiar iPhone form factor ride again, or move the entire lineup to the same form factor as the iPhone X. 

One big problem with moving the lower-cost iPhone to the iPhone X form factor is that this would've dramatically increased the need for the TrueDepth camera systems that are currently only used in the iPhone X. Considering the numerous reports that supply of components for this camera system held back iPhone X production and contributed to delayed availability of the device, going all-in on the TrueDepth camera would've been very risky for Apple. 

In addition, Apple would've had to bet on a relatively new type of display technology -- likely Japan Display's new FULL ACTIVE liquid crystal displays (LCDs) -- for such a device. This would've increased product risk and probably led to increased manufacturing costs as well. 

Foolish takeaway

The iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus represent relatively low-risk stopgap products on the way to a future where all iPhones have 3D sensing capabilities and full-face displays. Thanks to upgraded internals, cameras, and even the addition of the company's True Tone display technology, the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus are solid products that will do their jobs well over the next year. 

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Apple Inc. Stock Quote
Apple Inc.
AAPL
$138.93 (1.62%) $2.21

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
311%
 
S&P 500 Returns
110%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 07/02/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.