Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Lawsuit Alleging Uber’s Anti-Competitive Practices Drove Rival Out of Business Is Moving Forward

By Rich Duprey – Updated May 4, 2020 at 4:39PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Sidecar Technologies ended up selling its assets to GM after being driven from the market.

Uber Technologies (UBER -3.34%) is alleged to have engaged in anticompetitive practices that resulted in rival Sidecar Technologies going out of business, a point Sidecar's successor company will be allowed to pursue in a lawsuit against the ride-sharing leader.

A federal court judge in San Francisco found the allegations "sufficiently plausible" to allow the case to proceed against Uber.

Uber driver giving friends a ride

Image source: Uber Technologies.

Charges of bad faith

Founded in 2011, Sidecar Technologies was an early player in ride-sharing, operating in 11 U.S. markets and introducing innovations that are now standard in industry apps. 

Its founder Sunil Paul says Uber engaged in "predatory pricing" to undermine its rivals, subsidizing the costs of fares and the pay it gave to drivers, all the while planning to raise prices and cut driver compensation after it drove competition from the market.

Sidecar alleges that those practices actually caused it to go out of business, selling its assets to General Motors (GM -1.24%) in 2016, which Paul says was "because Uber is willing to win at any cost and they have practically limitless capital to do it."

Sidecar subsequently sued Uber. In January, district court chief magistrate judge Joseph Spero dismissed an earlier version of the case. However, he is allowing the new suit to go forward, writing, "At this stage, the court finds Sidecar's allegations of market power to be sufficiently plausible to avoid dismissal."

That doesn't mean SC Innovations v. Uber Technologies will be successful, of course, but it means the arguments deserve a hearing. Uber has faced increased scrutiny in recent years over various policies and safety measures, as well as communities and countries, imposing limits on its ability to operate in their jurisdictions.

Rich Duprey has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Uber Technologies, Inc. Stock Quote
Uber Technologies, Inc.
$26.89 (-3.34%) $0.93
General Motors Company Stock Quote
General Motors Company
$35.04 (-1.24%) $0.44

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 09/26/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.