The Fed's Inflation Conundrum & an AI Billionaire Battle Royale

In this podcast, Motley Fool analyst Jason Moser and contributors Travis Hoium and Lou Whiteman discuss:

• The Fed's decision to hold rates steady.
• Apple and Amazon earnings.
• An AI billionaire battle royale.
• Stocks to watch.

To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.

A full transcript is below.

This podcast was recorded on August 01, 2025.

Travis Hoium: There was a flood of earnings this week, but the Fed was investors' focus. Motley Fool Money starts now. I'm Travis Hoium joined by long time Fools, Lou the Legend Whiteman, and Mr. Pop culture Jason Moser. Today, we're going to cover earnings from Apple, Amazon, and, of course, some AI News. But first, the Federal Reserve. The Fed continues to get more attention than I can remember in my 30 years of investing. They decided to keep rates steady this week at 4.25-4.5%, much to the dismay of some, but let's get beyond the catchy headlines. If the Fed cuts rates, and they control the Fed funds rates by, let's say, 1%, something that a big cut that a lot of investors would love, that doesn't necessarily mean that your mortgage is going to go down and become cheap again like they were a few years ago. Jason, what is signal, and what's noise here from the Fed?

Jason Moser: Glad you brought that mortgage point up there, because I think that's been a narrative, I think that's been going around for a while, we need to bring these rates down so we can loosen the housing market back up. But listen, if mortgage rates right now at 6.5-7%, we start seeing these little incremental cuts. We're not going to be seeing those 4%, 3% mortgage rates anytime soon, if ever again. Most people I know, I certainly took advantage of it when I could. Most people have refinanced and got that 3%, 30 year fixed rate. It's going to be a new paradigm here. I think, in regard to the noise, I think the noise is the ongoing battle between the administration trying to push for these rate cuts. I think we can all agree that the Fed should be making decisions based on data and not political demands. That mandate that we typically refer to in regard to the Fed is essentially to conduct monetary policy with two goals in mind, maximum employment and stable prices. They're using data to make these decisions and not catering to the political demands that we see every single day, it seems like now.

I for one, am actually relieved, really to see that the Fed is standing its ground here, and Jerome Powell is, I think, diplomatically playing his hand. When we look at where inflation stands today, we saw right on Thursday the report that personal consumption expenditures price index, that main forecasting gauge, it moved up to 2.6% in June. That was the highest since February. Then core inflation, which excludes food and energy, was even a little bit higher at 2.8%. While the inflation picture is improving from some time ago, we're not out of the woods yet. I think the Fed is doing the right thing and really playing this deliberately. They're not taking any knee-jerk reactions, not kowtowing to the political rhetoric that's going on out there, maybe we see a rate cut or two here by the end of the year, but like you said, it's going to have such a modest impact overall. I think we got to probably keep our expectations in check.

Travis Hoium: Let's put some more data to that, too. The unemployment rate just came out this morning, 4.2%, same as it was a year ago. With this dual mandate, that doesn't seem to be a problem. If you're Jerome Powell, the worry is inflation. We haven't really seen the impact of something like tariffs yet. The other thing to bring into this is that the Fed controls short term rates. The market controls long term rates, and it's been interesting as there's been more speculation that rates are going to fall. Sometimes those long term rates actually go up, which is a market reaction, not necessarily something the Fed can control. But what do you think, Lou?

Lou Whiteman: I spot on what you guys are saying. I continue to believe the Fed will be much more reluctant to cut than what conventional wisdom, what everybody's saying. Rates are the primary blunt instrument that the Fed has, and I don't think they were enjoying life when rates were at zero, and they didn't have any levers to pull. Signal noise, I think the signal is the actual decision is the fact that, look, hey guys, we're fine here. The noise is all the commentary around it. The economy looks I don't know if it looks great, but there's things to worry about, but it actually looks pretty OK. We should be celebrating that. Be careful what you wish for here. If the Fed suddenly goes into dramatic rate cutting mode, I don't know if that's going to be something we're going to be celebrating.

Travis Hoium: We should touch on inflation at least a little bit. Like Jason said, we did get some data this week, and anecdotes are always a little bit dangerous, but my wife went back to school shopping. It's apparently time to start thinking about that already in July. But she went back to school shopping, the first thing she said when she got home was, it's not even fun anymore because prices are so high. How does this murky inflation picture play into things and how we should be thinking as investors, Jason?

Jason Moser: It is. The cost of living has seemingly gone up across the board. Just as a father of two college students, boy, you want to talk about back to school shopping moving from shirts to mini fridges and whatnot. Lou, you know what I'm talking about. It definitely does. It definitely does seem to only be getting more expensive. We've been talking about this all year. It's starting to get a little bit frustrating, but write the T word tariffs, and how is this ultimately going to impact us? It seems like every week when we have these discussions, it all boils down to, we just don't know. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy even said it in the call. In regard to tariffs, they simply just don't know because every day it's a headline that seems to counter what was said the day before. The one thing that we do know is that tomorrow there is going to be another headline that says something else. Until we actually get a little bit more clarity and a little bit more certainty and understanding as to exactly what the administration's trying to ultimately accomplish or what the end goal is, we are going to see a lot of that noise like we were talking about before here, and it just becomes very difficult for investors to fully make sense of it all. That's why I think, when you look at the way the market's performed year to date, the market it's performing OK.

Today's obviously a little bit of a sell out there based on the unemployment data. But overall, the market has had a decent year thus far, given all of the noise that we've been hearing. I think investors, they're starting to throw their hands up and say, you know what? We're going to admit it. We don't know what we don't know, and there's only so much we can control here. It's important for investors, I think, Number 1, to remain focused on that longer term picture and just focus on the fundamentals. If you're indexing, keep on indexing. If you're focused on investing in individual companies, focus on the fundamentals, businesses that can weather storms like these times of uncertainty like these, because one thing is for sure, this won't last forever.

Lou Whiteman: It really feels like, I call it a boiling frog economy. Investors have been focused for months on headlines, inflation, tariffs on Main Street. Well, it's not really about headlines. It's about these things just creeping in overtime. I'm still hopeful we're strong enough to weather higher costs, and it's not going to just crash the economy. If nothing else, it feels like the second half of the year. I don't know if there will ever be that clarity. I don't know if there will ever be that headline that just solves things, but I think it's just going to be a slow grind if we're going to hear more and more about costs. I do think at some point, it starts impacting consumer decision-making, and maybe the investor debate is, to what extent? Like Jason says, we're just going to have to wait and see.

Travis Hoium: Someday this won't be a lead topic on Motley Fool Money, but that day is not quite here yet.

Lou Whiteman: Not today.

Jason Moser: As we move to earnings, Meta was one of the big earnings reports this week. Revenue was up 22%-$47.5 billion. Net income jumped 36%-$18.3 billion, one quarter. They made $18.3 billion. Somehow, they found 6% more daily active users than they already had. Lou, what jumped out to you in the quarter?

Lou Whiteman: That's it. Who knew there were actually more people out there that Meta hasn't found yet. That's always amazing when it goes up. But kidding aside, you hit on it. The core business, that advertising business is just a fabulous business, 8 billion in free cash flow in the quarter, and that's with all the investments, that's actually down. But the other thing that stands out I'm not the first to notice this, but Travis, they are putting that money to work. CFO, Susan Li said, We really believe this is the time for us to make investments and investing they are CAPEX more than doubled in the quarter. They made it crystal clear that will continue. They're making all the money, but boy, are they spending.

Travis Hoium: That CAPEX number, they didn't actually raise it the way that Alphabet did, but they did pump it up a little bit to 66-$72 billion, the higher end of their previous range. The other thing, Jason, they talked about was this superintelligence plan that Mark Zuckerberg has for bringing personal superintelligence, and he threw some arrows at other big tech companies.

Jason Moser: He did. It's this difference in opinion there on, are we going to be using AI to lift ourselves up at the personal level, or are we going to be using AI to ultimately replace what we as people, as employees do today. He's taking the bet that we will be able to use AI to lift ourselves up more on the personal level and become more productive. I like that vision. I think that's something we all are aspiring to do with technology. It's been interesting to watch the evolution of Facebook slash Meta. Social media company, to Metaverse company now to AI company. I think that with Meta, the important thing to know, this is still an ad business, like Lou mentioned. They're using AI to make their core business better, and they're seeing greater efficiency and gains in the recommendation model for ads. It drove roughly 5% more ad conversion on Instagram for the quarter and 3% on Facebook. It's bringing more engaging experiences to users. Helping users discover content they find most useful in AI technologies leading it led to a 5% increase in time spent on Facebook and a 6% increase in time spent on Instagram for the quarter. I think it's interesting to note how the company is using AI. It may not be so explicit for us as users, for users of the platforms but what they're doing with that technology to make their core business more efficient it driving that net income number, like you said, 36% of it with 38% growth in earnings per share, that's just amazing to see.

Travis Hoium: It's not driving results yet, but they did talk a lot about momentum that they have in glasses. I know, Lou, you got to be an early adopter of these glasses.

Lou Whiteman: For one thing, can we just say that some of this Zuck talk, it's got an imaginary friend vibe, and I'm not sure what about that. We'll see. But the glasses, Zuck, first of all, I wear glasses. You got to fill my prescription, if you want me to wear these, because I don't know if I have a lot of desire guys, to spend more than I already. Even with Warby Parker, thank you. But just to use my phone less, I don't know if I'm really there. Travis, I can't really think of why I would be an early adopter here. The tech is neat. I think it's really cool, but if all you're really doing is meaning I look at my phone seven times less because I'm always looking at my glasses.

Travis Hoium: You're still looking at something?

Lou Whiteman: That's true.

Travis Hoium: Well, when we come back, we're going to get two more earnings reports from this week. This is Motley Fool Money.

Lou Whiteman: Wish you could lock in rates without locking out liquidity. Meet LDDR a LifeX Treasury Bond Ladder ETF built to simplify your cash flow plan for the next 10 years. With LDDR, you can lock in today's interest rates for a decade. It's built to deliver predictable monthly cash flow that boosts interest income by including tax-free return of principal. That means the potential for higher, more stable cash flow without worrying about rate cuts, reinvestment risk or market swings. LDDR, take the guesswork out of your cash flow plan. Learn more at lifexfunds.com. The LifeX ETFs return principle over the life of an ETF, and therefore expected to have little or no assets remaining to distribute at the time of liquidation. Individual bonds carry an obligation to fully return the principal to shareholders at maturity. However, ETFs have no such obligation. The net asset value of the ETFs will decline over time as income payments are made to shareholders. The tax discussion herein is general in nature. Investors should consult with their tax advisor about the effect that an investment in LifeX ETFs could have on their tax situation. Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks and charges and expenses of LDDR carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company and can be obtained by visiting www.lifexfunds.com or by calling 1-888-331-5558. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing. Investing in the LifeX ETFs involve risk. Principal laws is possible. The LifeX income ETFs are distributed by Foresight Financial Services, LLC.

Travis Hoium: Apple reported earnings after the market closed on Thursday. Market seems to be happy with the results and the momentum is strong in everything but wearables. Lou, what do we need to know about Apple's second quarter?

Lou Whiteman: For a MAG-7 stock, we came into earnings season with a lot of uncertainty with Apple. The company had warned of a potential $900 million tariff hit and single digit growth, but this quarter, much better than that, 10% top line growth, 12% earnings growth, 46% growth margin, stronger than expected iPhone sales. Travis, we even saw a return to growth in China, which was a nice surprise. We haven't seen growth in China for a while.

Lou Whiteman: There are a lot of unanswered questions, and those questions remain unanswered. Some of this momentum could be a tariff pull forward. We'll figure that out. They're still trying to figure out AI. They're still in search of that next big thing, the must have device. This quarter didn't answer any of those big picture questions, but it does remind us of the obvious to think right in front of our face that Apple is a fantastically profitable company with a terrific franchise and a lot of options to partner for AI, a lot of ways to win. Bold prediction here, guys, I know Apple maybe they do have some drama, maybe they have some questions, but they're going to be fine. This quarter is a good reminder of that.

Travis Hoium: They even opened up the possibility of making some acquisitions in artificial intelligence, which could get them from nowhere to at least in the ballgame. Jason, Amazon has been in the Motley Fool's portfolio, and recommendations for about 30 years now has made a lot of investors a lot of money. But the company isn't the growth engine that once was revenue for the second quarter was up 13% to $168 billion. Net income jumped almost 50% to 18.2 billion. What was your takeaway from the quarter?

Lou Whiteman: I mean, I think you're right. I'm thankfully one of those investors have been able to hold on to these shares for a long time, and it's obviously done very well for a lot of our members, a lot of investors everywhere. But you're right. This isn't the same growth story as it was before. I mean, it's such a big company now. I mean, those numbers just have to pull back a little. I think you're looking at 13% top line growth there. I think that was relatively impressive. But I think when you look under the hood with Amazon, that's when you start really realizing that this is not just an e-commerce business, and there are so many other powerful parts to this company that are helping drive growth. Now, I think what we talk about often with Amazon is AWS, Amazon Web Services, and that has really grown to become a big driver of the company's overall profitability. I mean, it's essentially responsible for most of its operating profit, if we're being honest. That growth there, 17% to $31 billion for the core. That was good. Now, it seems like the WISPR numbers out there, the market was expecting a little bit more somewhere in the neighborhood of maybe 20%, and when we see the competition coming from companies like Alphabet and Microsoft as they build out their web services aspirations, their cloud businesses, I mean, we're starting to see Alphabet and Microsoft, they're taking some share. I think that's something at least to keep an eye on there in regard to Amazon.

I mean, Amazon had a big head start. They used that philosophy of just continuing to drive down prices and offer new services and features for users, and that did a great job of gaining a dominant presence in the market really fast. But you look at companies like Alphabet, Microsoft, they are they're catching up. I think that's something that investors will want to keep an eye on here in the coming years. Now, the other thing with Amazon that I think it just doesn't get as much attention but the thing that continues to stand out to me is this advertising business that they built. Travis, I don't know if you've looked at this lately in regard to their ad business. I mean, this is sneaky, but it's really powerful. They grew revenue in the advertising business 22% for the quarter, and they continue to ink important relationships with companies like Roku and Disney. I mean, they're reaching 300 plus million, household, 300 plus million users out there on a daily basis with all of their content, the many ways they have to distribute it. Then the other part of the business, we talk about that demand side platform business, the DSP, and the company that we always shine the light on there is The Trade Desk. The Trade Desk, tremendous company, a company that has done very well for investors. I'm included there, so I'm thankful for it, also. But let's put it into context here. The Trade Desk trailing 12 month revenue is $2.5 billion. Amazon's ad business just brought in $15.7 billion this quarter alone, and it's continuing to grow at those double digit rates. I think it's worth looking at Amazon and saying, You know what? This is a business that's made up of a lot of different parts, and they're executing very well, but definitely, when you look at that web services side of the business, I mean, the competition is heating up there, and I think it's going to be a little bit tougher days ahead for them to really maintain that dominant position.

Travis Hoium: That will be the thing to watch, and to the advertising point, it's interesting that the market is very concerned about Google's ten Blue Links and artificial intelligence disrupting that but not as concerned about Amazon's ad business. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley Fool or may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Next up, we're going to have a battle of the AI billionaires. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

Lou Whiteman: We already knew that Big Tech was going to go all in on artificial intelligence, but the stakes have gotten even higher over the past week or two. Alphabet up their CapEx budget from $75 billion to $85 billion this year. Promise to even increase that next year. Amazon and Microsoft are spending about $30 billion a quarter, and Medes CapEx is going to be right around $69 billion for the year. There are still a few VC companies involved here, like Open AI anthropic and perplexity, but a lot of the small players are falling by the wayside. I thought it would be fun to look at artificial intelligence and put these companies and their leaders in a battle. I'm going to call this the AI billionaire Battle Royale. I'm going to give you guys the opportunity to pit some of these leaders against each other and give us a score like a boxing scorecard. Ten, nine, ten, eight, if it's really a landslide. If there's a draw between both of you, I'm going to decide the winner here. Let's choose wisely. The four players that we have here, I'm not going to put Elon Musk in this, but we have Sundar Pichai of Alphabet, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Site Adela at Microsoft, and Sam Altman of Open AI. I think those are the really big names in artificial intelligence really guiding the industry right now. Our first battle has real beef today, Mark Zuckerberg versus Sam Altman. Zuck has been buying up Open AI's talent, reportedly $100 million offers for AI engineers, and he's spending that money because he's trying to go from lagger to hopefully leader in AI. Lou, give me some blow by blow on who wins this battle.

Lou Whiteman: My mental picture here is Sam Altman comes out, dressed to the nines, perfect, just looks the part. Zuckerberg almost comes out like a street fighter. But when the actual fight starts, it's not even close the other way. Zuckerberg is playing catch up, but Zuckerberg's got this massive ad business generating capital at his back as he's throwing punches. Altman has to beg for money and has done a lot of deals because of the nature of Open AI. He's actually in the background while he's fighting his opponent. He's also fighting Microsoft and things like that as he runs off to the side.

Travis Hoium: He's doing a dual battle.

Lou Whiteman: Yeah. This ends up, flashy coming in, looking really great. Sam Altman, he gets a few punches in. I don't want to be too dismissive of Open AI, but that advertising business, the muscle to play the game that goes with that, this ends up 10:8 Zuckerberg running away. It could even be a technical knockout here.

Travis Hoium: Lou thinks the balance sheet is going to be more important than the mind share that ChatGPT already has. What do you think, Jason?

Jason Moser: Well, one of these things is not like the other. I mean, we've got Meta, which is publicly traded company. I mean, it has many more levers to pull in regard to raising capital. It's just many more avenues toward raising that capital, whereas, as Lou noted there with Sam Altman, I mean, he has to sell the sizzle. He has to get out there and keep that mind share going and figure out ways to raise that money. Now, will we see Open AI go public eventually? Who knows? If they do, then obviously that opens up some avenues for them. I tell you. You look at what Mark Zuckerberg has done with Meta to date. I mean, the IPO back in, I think, what May of 2012, the stock is up better than 1,900% since then. I mean, he's doing something right, and I think he's doing something right in the face of making some questionable decisions along the way. I mean, we were talking earlier about the evolution of Meta from social media company to Metaverse company. I mean, that metaverse thing just hasn't really worked out. He was able to burn $15 billion or so a year and it just didn't really matter.

Travis Hoium: It didn't matter at all. I mean, they're doing some cool stuff, but it's not having any a material impact on the business really. It's still at the end of the day. This is an advertising business, and I'm not saying that as an insult. It is a very powerful advertising business, and he's finding ways to utilize AI technology to make that advertising engine more powerful, more efficient. In April, Zuckerberg said that Meta is focused on developing an AI model that can in turn build as much as half of other AI models within the next year, which I think is just amazing to think about. Altman, he's a unique guy. He's got all sorts of interests. I think fascinating. He's got his pilot's license. He's expresses his dreams of starting his own airline one day. You do have to wonder where his head's at sometime and if this is really what he wants to be doing for the long haul. I'm in agreement with Lou there. I'm not going to go with a 10:8 blowout. I would probably just go 10:9 in favor of Zuckerberg, in this case, just because I think Meta has so many more ways to really raise that capital and continue building out these AI aspirations.

Lou Whiteman: Let's remember here, guys. One of these two is actually a trained kickboxer, too. I know we're not talking about physically fighting, but that has to come in somewhere.

Travis Hoium: There was that planned actual fight with Ion Musk at one point that never actually happened.

Lou Whiteman: It's amazing, too, to think about these two guys that dropped out of college. Mark Zuckerberg drops out of Harvard, Altman drops out of Stanford. I mean, these guys are living the life. It's it's fascinating to see.

Travis Hoium: It's interesting that you both had it pretty decidedly for Zuckerberg. I don't know that I would have guessed that going in because ChatGPT, everybody thinks that they're the leader in the club house. To the second one, this is the non founder battle. We have Sundar Pichai from Alphabet, Sati and Adela from Microsoft, also Same Alton's partner, sometimes on again off again. Jason, you're up first here. These companies have more money in infrastructure than anyone else we're talking about, but who wins about.

Jason Moser: Two really amazing businesses, two very impressive leaders there, and you look at Satan Adele. He took over the CEO role in February of 2014. Stock is up better than 1,300%. I was close to 1,350% I think since he took over. If you remember, I mean, during the Balmer years, it was like ten years where the stock did nothing at all. Shareholders have got to really be loving him, and he's a thoughtful guy. Guy, he reads poetry, Indian American poetry. He loves Russian novels. I mean, he's a thoughtful guy, and he clearly has the background, master's degree in computer science, master's degree in business administration, and he said back in April that as much as 30% of the company's code is now actually written by artificial intelligence. They certainly are using AI to their benefit. I think when you look at Sundar Pichai, I think he's been a very effective leader, as well. I mean, Google, Alphabet shareholders have won. They've done well. Stock is up, I think, 200% since he took over in December of 2019. But I think he's dealing with a little bit of a different situation here, Alphabet, particularly in regard to the regulatory issues. I mean, there are a lot of unknowns in regard to the remedies that might be suggested as far as what regulators want Alphabet to ultimately do if they want them to split off part of the business, whether it's YouTube or Search or sell off Android or what not. I think there's a little bit more uncertainty there right now, and I think that with Nadella's position being with the company a little bit longer than Pacays been with Alphabet, I'm going to give Satya Nadella the lead here. I'm going to go 10:8 in this case, actually. I really have been so impressed with what Satya Nadella has done with Microsoft during his tenure, and it seems like he really is enthusiastic and looking to keep it going.

Travis Hoium: Interesting. The fact that Sam Altman and Open AI have been ungrateful partner after really Microsoft funded the company, gave him $10 billion. I think that was almost immediately after ChatGPT released. That doesn't take too much away. Lou, who do you have in this battle?

Lou Whiteman: This is the heavyweight battle. Not to switch sports, but if this was the final four, we'd all be complaining that the two best teams were meeting in the semifinal. That's my take on here, because Jason's two great businesses, two, I think, heavyweights the two will come out swinging.

Lou Whiteman: I'm going to end up with Nadella here, in part what Jason said, they can both throw a punch, but we have to see about how Pasha can take a punch. I think because there are questions about the advertising business. I think it works out fine, but there are those questions. The other thing I'd say that I think gives Microsoft and Nadella the leg up here is when they go on the offensive. Of all of these big companies, Microsoft, with the nature of their business and all of the conduits they have into corporate customers with office, with 365, with so many products, they, to me, have the clearest path to actually monetize all of this AI stuff outside of internal use outside of just building their business. It just seems like their existing connections work so well when you go on the offensive. Yeah, they both come out swinging. They both land some blows, but Nadella is just a little bit stronger on the punch and shy between the advertising business, the regulatory, maybe, can't take the blows the same way or it has to take a few more blows. I'll go 10, 9 here, but I get it. Definitely I don't see this as a knockout, but I think Nadella wins for me.

Travis Hoium: Our championship is Zuckerberg versus Nadella. Lou, I'm going to go to you first, between those two. We've got basically founder led company in Meta platforms. Yeah, changed its name. Gone from social media to Metaverse, now to artificial intelligence. But it is a founder. I think it's pretty clear that he's been a good leader, especially over the past few years, and Nadella running one of the biggest most established tech companies in the world. Who do you have?

Lou Whiteman: This could really be fun to watch and no disrespect to here. But if this was wrestling and not boxing, you can see Zuck playing a little dirty here, can't you? I mean that with respect. I think this would be a fun one to watch. I do think, though, again, I said I thought the second bout with two heavyweights, Microsoft not just what they're investing. But Nadella, his plan to monetize it and actually get it out, I'll be honest with you, I'm kind of annoyed with some of the prompts I'm getting in Excel right now. Microsoft, I will let you know if I need Open AI. You don't have to ask me every time if I want to use it, but I do think that as annoying as it is, just like Clippy it works. I think that they are the grand champion here. Zuck will get some blows in. Zuck will definitely go on the offensive all over the place. I think it's probably a closer fight than I thought when I sat down, so I'll say 10, 9, but I am going to crown a champion at Microsoft and Nadella here.

Travis Hoium: What about you, Jason?

Jason Moser: Travis, I'm going to have to agree with Lou here. I'm going to go ahead and give you the answer first. I would have to give the nod to Nadella here. I think part of it, I think the market is telling us something along the way here. We're looking at Microsoft. It just crossed over that four trillion dollar market cap this week. Joining Nvidia is one of only two companies to ever do that. Now, Microsoft, yes, generates a little bit more on the revenue side than Meta does today. But I think what we've seen with Satya Nadella during his tenure at Microsoft is very clear vision. We've seen him lay out the strategy. He knew that the puck was going toward the Cloud, so he started skating there immediately. He laid out that strategy from the very beginning, and it was just very clear. We could see what he was doing. We talk about Amazon before being a company with a number of different ways to win. They do a few things they're doing very well. Microsoft is a similar business. They have a number of different ways that they can win, and just the scale the company has and the operating platform and the cloud services that it provides. I think it just does a lot of things very well. It's not to take anything away from Meta and Mark Zuckerberg here. I think that the one concern I have, and I'm not a shareholder of either company. But the one concern I have with Meta is Mark Zuckerberg can be all over the place.

We talked about that before social media to Metaverse to AI to what's going to be next. He does say a lot of things, and then it does materialize. He pushes it by the wayside and then goes toward something else. What we ultimately have here is just a massive social networking company with a tremendous advertising business behind it. I think that's something that's going to continue. But, as we've seen with Facebook, Facebook is starting to go on the, I don't want to say the decline, but more interest is on the Instagram side. Social networks aren't forever. I think they live their life, and then people go elsewhere. I would be a little bit concerned just in regard to the lifespan of things like Facebook and ultimately Instagram at some point. Now, they have WhatsApp obviously, which has got a lot of potential there, as well. I think we probably could expect to see Meta make more acquisitions down the road to try to expand that portfolio of platforms it has. But for me, if I'm looking at it from a confidence level, I just feel more confident with Satya Nadella and the clarity of his vision and what he's done with the company to date. I'm going to give it 10 to 9 in favor of Satya Nadella.

Travis Hoium: Interesting that there's regulatory concerns for alphabet, but Meta could make acquisitions. I don't know if the government would let any of these companies make any real acquisitions, although that's not what they're doing anymore. They're just buying talent, so maybe that's the way around that.

Lou Whiteman: Yeah, they definitely be under the microscope, for sure, going forward.

Travis Hoium: Interesting that you guys we're basically in agreement, and I completely disagreed on every one of your choices. I would have had Sundar Pichai in the lead here, for sure. But this is going to be fascinating to watch because there's literally hundreds of billions of dollars at stake for these big tech companies, and even for them, that's a lot of money. Next up, we're going to get to the stocks on our radar. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

Ready to launch your business, get started with the commerce platform made for entrepreneurs. Shopify is specially designed to help you start, run, and grow your business with easy, customizable themes that let you build your brand, marketing tools that get your products out there, integrated shipping solutions that actually save you time from start-ups to scale ups, online, in person, and on the go. Shopify's made for entrepreneurs like you. Sign up for your $1 a month trial at shopify.com/setup.

Travis Hoium: We have time for one quick earnings take and Cloudflare is one of those interesting companies in technology. Jason, what did we learn this quarter?

Jason Moser: Interesting reaction right after the release stock was up 6% that we saw this morning down 6%. Now it seems like it's about flat, but I think it was a very encouraging quarter from a number of perspectives. For one, we did not hear mention of elongated sales cycles in the call anywhere, Travis. That may mean that their enterprise customers are feeling a little bit better about the money that they're spending, and that is definitely showing up in the numbers. Revenue was up 28%. They crossed over the two billion dollar annual run rate. It is a company that continues to sign on to develop relationships with large customers. Now, 3,712 large customers spending at least $100,000 annually. That was up 22% from a year ago. Those customers now account for 71% of total revenue. That's up from 67% a year ago. Encouragingly, dollar-based net retention rate, which is a metric we pay attention to that tells us how they're expanding those relationships that rose to 114% for the quarter, that was up from 112% a year ago. Again, that's just a sign that they continue to keep those customers and develop new relationships, expand those relationships. Not a lot to see here. I think this was just another solid quarter from Cloudflare and CEO Matthew Prince seems really amp about the company's future. Does the fact that the stock is trading for 40 times sales make you nervous?

Lou Whiteman: Yes, I think valuation is going to be the biggest risk for a company like this. Until they can get to actual profitability and cash flow, valuation is just going to be one of the biggest risks withholding a company like this.

Travis Hoium: We like to end the show with stocks on our radar. Jason, your first up, what are you looking at this week?

Jason Moser: Yeah, PayPal reported earnings, and it was a good quarter, nothing crazy one way or the other. We saw they exceeded guidance that leadership set a quarter ago. They raised guidance for the full year, saw revenue up 5% with earnings per share up 18% from a year ago. They saw transaction margin dollars grow 7%. Total payment volume grew 6%, and encouragingly, Venmo continues to gain traction. Revenue there was up 20% with total payment volume in the Venmo network up 12%. It's growing beyond peer to peer. They're developing more commerce relationships and users are using it more for things like shopping and transactions as opposed to just peer to peer money transfers. That's all very encouraging. It was a good quarter. Shares have had a tough year so far down something like 18% year to date, certainly underperforming the market while all the key performance indicators continue to trend in the right direction. With shares that around 14 times full year earnings projections today, it just seems like the market has taken a glass half empty view on this one.

Travis Hoium: What about you, Lou?

Lou Whiteman: I'm going to look at Howmet Aerospace. Ticker HWM. It's boring, but they make fasteners, other small parts, mostly for aircraft engines. They reported the classic beaten raise this week, really strong demand. Travel is holding up, and as we all know, Boeing has had some drama, so that's causing airlines to lean on their existing fleet more, that's creating huge demand for spare parts. Howmet is riding that wave, investing in its future, building out its manufacturing capacity. It's also aggressively reducing its share count. Cash stock is up 84% over the past year. Some of that was low hanging fruit. Some of that is just they went from being poorly managed to well managed. I don't think they can do another double in the next year, but this is a very well run company, and I think it's setting up to be a long term market beater.

Travis Hoium: As I look at both of these, I can't get past the fact that PayPal is so cheap. This seems like one of these companies that just continues to perform well quarter after quarter. I don't love the products. I don't really use many of them, but they seem to have a really, really sticky business. If I get a pick out of those two, sorry, Lou, I'm going to go with PayPal. For Lou Whiteman and Jason Moser and our production leader today, Bart Shannon and the entire Motley Fool team, I'm Travis Hoium. Thank you for listening to Motley Fool Money. We'll see you here tomorrow.