In this episode of Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Fool contributors Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Rachel Warren discuss:
- Uber’s Q1 2026 results.
- Can Uber make an “everything” app?
- Disney’s momentum and challenges.
- Novo Nordisk’s GLP-1 conundrum.
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
A full transcript is below.
This podcast was recorded on May 6, 2026.
Travis Hoium: Earning season is in full swing, and we have good news for investors today. Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now. Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoium. I'm joined today by Lou Whiteman and Rachel Warren. This is one of those days during earnings season where there is just a flood of earnings. We got some interesting announcements. We're going to talk today about Uber, Disney, and Novo Nordisk. Let's start with Uber, Lou. Disruption has been on the market's mind in 2026, and that has impacted a lot of software-related stocks. Because Uber is maybe in the crossfire a little bit here, but shares were down about 12% over the past year. There's worries that Waymo is going to take market share. Tesla's potentially expanding, although we don't know how quickly that's going to happen. But Uber is really taking an interesting strategy here, not only moving into autonomy overall, but also becoming more than a ride-sharing company. They've got more retailers. They recently announced hotels on the app. Their earnings were pretty good. They're still growing at 20% and just compounding that year over year. When you look at their earnings in the strategy shift that they're going through right now, what do you think?
Lou Whiteman: Look, I love what they're doing. I think the core business looks great. This whole idea of, like, we were talking about beforehand, this everything app that they're creating, moving around, I'll take the under on that, Travis.
Travis Hoium: You don't think that Uber is going to be a one-stop shop for all things mobility related, whether you're moving people, products, vacation.
Lou Whiteman: Look, it makes total sense. Just like PayPal is everything app, made total sense as your one-stop shop on your throne. Just like Meta, what they tried to do with WhatsApp, especially in developing markets, made all the sense in the world as a one-stop everything app. X makes perfect sense as a one-stop everything app. People don't want everything apps. Companies want everything apps because everything means we get all of the revenue. We can expand our business on the back of our customer base. I get that, but customers don't want that. Customers are used to what they're doing. Unless you really give them a deal and ruin the economics for you, how do you change just behavior? Look, it's a great idea. If they're not spending too much, go forward, but it's not going to work. None of these everything apps have worked, and this one won't work.
Travis Hoium: Let me push back on that with one example, and that's Amazon. Amazon, I think, has probably done a better job than any other company becoming the Everything app for at least shopping, and then throw a little bit of video on top of that, throw pharmaceuticals and all stuff. You don't think that Uber could potentially do that with their realm. It's not retail. It's more, Hey, I need to move myself, or I needed to move something around, and that's kind of the core is that transportation as a service.
Lou Whiteman: I reject the premise of that comparison. I don't, Amazon is doing a lot of things, but I think more Amazon desperately begs me to do Grubhub through their app, and I don't that everything app comparison, and I don't think that works. The fact that Amazon has expanded into new markets, I don't know if that's because they have an everything app. Again, I get the idea of it. If I want but look, if I want to ride share, I'm probably going to go to Uber. To train me to do other things, like, Oh, I want to book a trip. I'm going to go to Uber. No, I'm going to go to booking. I'm going to go to Delta. I'm going to go to all of the things I go to. Again, points for trying, gold star. Again, I can't combat this enough. The core business looks pretty good. I guess this is when you experiment and go ahead and try, but it's not going to work. We've seen this so many times, and it makes so much sense for the companies. The companies fall in love with it because look at all the. If we could just get 2% of this market, that would be so much revenue. Those are the conversations they're having right now. I get why they're all slapping themselves in the back, but wake me up when it happens.
Travis Hoium: Rachel, do you think that this is a strategy shift that's fun to talk about, but still, the core business is really what matters here? Revenue was up in the quarter, 14%. We have gross bookings were up 25%. Things seem like they're doing pretty well in the core, like Lou said, but are these ancillary additions going to mean anything?
Rachel Warren: Yeah, I do think that the important focus right now is the core business, which is doing exceptionally well, but I think I have a little bit of a different take on this than Lou. Obviously, we're seeing this strategy, right, where they're wanting to shift from being known as the ride-hailing and delivery app to maybe become something of a super app, which would center on the entire travel journey. This partnership they have, where they're adding hundreds of thousands of hotel listings through Expedia and vacation rentals via Vrbo, this idea that we're seeing where Uber wants to be the first app you open, say, when you land in a new city. That goal, I think, is to create a very seamless experience where you maybe book your hotel, you get a discounted ride there, you order food, or forgotten essentials.
It's interesting, too, because this is a model that has proven really, really successful in other parts of the world. You think of WeChat in China. It's the gold standard of super apps. You've got 1 billion users on there that do everything from messaging and paying bills to booking their doctor's appointments. You've got Grab in Southeast Asia. There's Gojek in Indonesia. This is a model that has been successful in many markets. Now, in a lot of the Western markets where Uber predominantly operates, this is not so much the type of app that consumers tend to use. I think they're trying to see whether the appetite is there. I think by bundling some of these services, this idea is to create something of a loyalty loop, right, where maybe you earn credits on Big Ticket Hotel Stay, pays for your daily rides. There's a lot of incentives with Uber One. There's a challenge, though, for consumer adoption, and I think that's the biggest question about whether this works for Uber specifically long term, because the model itself works very well in other markets.
Travis Hoium: Well, the interesting piece here, Lou, is the Uber One piece. The analogy that I would make is to Costco. Costco is the company that made this really profitable and huge business. They basically run their stores at break-even. That's why they have really low gross margins. That's why their products are cheaper when you go into the store, and they build everything around basically being break-even at the store and making that the best experience they could possibly. Then all the profit comes from those memberships that you pay each year to be a member of Costco. Could something like that work for Uber? Reduce that take rate and say, Hey, if we have 100 million subscribers to Uber One at 10, 20 bucks a month, that could be a really good business.
Lou Whiteman: It could. But again, look, if this isn't that novel, the difference with Costco is, at the end of the day, you're getting a really good price on all of these things. I don't know. With third parties, can Uber manage those margins? But, look, I'm flying Delta tomorrow. The second I bought an airplane ticket, Delta said, Hey, you want to get your rental car through me? You want to get your hotel through me. You know what I didn't, then I paid for it with a Capital One card. Capital One said, Hey, you're taking a trip. Do you know about our Capital One Travel app, where you can get your rental car and hotel? Look at what Airbnb has tried with experiences. Tell me. That's a fine app.
Travis Hoium: That is a great pushback. Airbnb has not been successful moving into other areas.
Lou Whiteman: What it is that, again, I get why Uber wants to do this. I get why it makes sense. I think the really hard thing is to change consumer behavior. Why does it make sense for me, the consumer, to do it? I get convenience, but I got convenience everything. I can go to booking.com and do it all if I really want convenience. I just think changing consumer behavior is much harder than these companies realized at the time. Again, I go back to, I thought the PayPal everything app was a really good idea. I do think that if we had followed through on it, probably it would have made my life and everyone's life easier. Yet, none of us did it, anyway, because we're stuck in our habits, and I feel like that's what's going to happen here.
Travis Hoium: Can Uber change people's behavior? Just remember that 20 years ago, getting in a random person's vehicle to get a ride across town was it completely foreign concept. [OVERLAPPING]
Lou Whiteman: But again, yes, was it convenient? I didn't have another way, I'm used to doing it. It was a foreign concept. I mean again, yeah, I get it. I love these Strawman reasons why. I'd love to be an optimist here. It would probably be easy to just do it all through one app. But again, I'll believe it I see.
Travis Hoium: Well, the market is buying it for today. Shares were up about 10% early in trading, so we'll see if that holds. When we come back, we're going to get to the news from Disney. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
ADVERTISEMENT: Dell PCs with Intel inside are built for the moments that matter, for the moments you plan and the ones you don't. Built for the busy days that turn into all-night study sessions, the moment you're working from a cafe and realize every outlet is taken. The times you're deep in your flow, and the absolute last thing you need is an auto update throwing off your momentum. That's why Dell builds tech that adapts to the way you actually work, built with a long-lasting battery, so you're not scrambling for the closest outlet, and built-in intelligence that makes updates around your schedule, not in the middle of it. They don't build tech for tech’s sake. They build it for you. Fine technology built for the way you work at dell.com/DellPCs built for you.
Travis Hoium: Welcome back to Motley Fool's Hidden Gems Investing. We got results from Disney this morning, and this is one of those companies that's gotten a lot of flag for investors. Shares have really struggled if you look back over the past decade or so. We have a new CEO, Josh D'Amaro, this quarter. I thought was interesting, Rachel, because there's not a lot of flash there, but it is just steady as it goes. The company's growing. Profitability is improving. This is what we want to see, and Disney just seems like the kind of company that the market would love. You have a lot of these big retailers that the market's saying, Hey, these companies aren't going anywhere. Let's trade 50 times earnings. Disney's not getting the same love from the market, but it seems like the results are showing that this business has a ton of staying power.
Rachel Warren: I think it goes to show that sometimes market responses to earnings reports are not always logical. This was a solid, fantastic quarter for the business. We're more of the same. They hit a record 25 billion in revenue. That was up 7% year over year, so the core business continues to grow at a really solid clip. Operating income for Disney+ and Hulu jumped 88%. You saw the entertainment division grow revenue by 10%. That was notable because they're carrying the weight for the stagnant sports segment, that's dealing with a lot pressure due to rising rights fees. Even though we're seeing consumer spending fatigue, we're seeing some shifts in international travel experiences. Revenue rose 7%, and part of that was because they increased the average spend per guest. The newly minted CEO, Josh D'a\maro, he's moving fast to really centralize marketing and use AI personalization to keep streaming margins above 10%. He's been cutting costs through strategic layoffs. They're moving forward with that $60 billion investment plan. They're trying to turn hits like Inside Out 2 and Moana 2 into physical destinations. The takeaway for me here is, I think betting on physical experiences is very much a safer, long-term play for Disney than, say, trying to enter into this endless content arms race with Netflix, leading into that experiences division, which already accounts for a lot of their overall profit. They're monetizing their fans multiple times. This is proving to be a really consistently profitable strategy, even in a difficult macro environment.
Travis Hoium: Lou, it seems like the experiences business tomorrow came from the experiences side of the business. That does seem to be the core. It didn't say that anything was changing strategically, but that sports business more and more seems like it doesn't quite fit under the Disney umbrella. Maybe we see some changes there, but it seems like there's a lot of tailwinds for Disney. I did a little bit of research recently on the Disney experiences, and they have a lot of capacity in Florida coming online. That's not to mention the cruise lines and all the other expansions they have around the world. This may be moving in the right direction for a while.
Lou Whiteman: We're not going to call this a referendum on tomorrow because he was only CEO for 14 days of that quarter or so, I doubt. But again, That's good. We don't want it. This looks like a perfectly fine, large company report. Look, there's a lot of parts in the investing world where we're not going to strike up a band for 7% revenue growth, high single-digit revenue growth. But given Disney's size, given the fact that my big takeaway here is that everything's fine. With slow and steady, maybe what we needed with Disney, cause we haven’t gotten that quarter-to-quarter for a couple of years. I will say, though, I don't know why this big amalgamation of assets is really should wow investors or excite investors. You mentioned sports. There's a legacy TV business. The more and more I look at this company, the more and more I think that it would benefit from some more strategic pairings or more strategic vestitures than I realized. We've talked about the legacy TV. We've talked about maybe sports, maybe almost all of the streaming. Maybe not get rid of it completely, but find partnerships, just to focus on, as you say, the experiences, the things they do really well, getting that IP, keeping that IP in-house. But I don't know if this is ever really going to work as a market WoW investment. As is, when it's just this huge bundle of everything. I think maybe the D'Amaro era might be about what they sell, where they partner, where they decide we don't have to do it in-house. I think that might be what the future is for this company.
Travis Hoium: It's pretty easy to see some value here if you're a long-term investor, though you lose probably right. This is not going to be a double-digit, 20% growth company, but the company is growing. Price earnings multiple on a trailing basis is 17 on a forward basis, it's under 15. If we get some sort of pullback in the market, the market is probably going to like some of these safer stocks that single-digit growth at a mid-teens priced earnings multiple isn't all that bad of a formula.
Lou Whiteman: Well, so the question there is, is that if that pullback comes, why does it come? If it comes because the consumers under pressure, it's probably not going to be Disney Ealing into there. Because so much of it is the parks and experiences. But, yeah, I do think that this is looking more like ballast than exciting. Again, I wonder if there isn't a way to not turn into Six Flags, to keep their natural advantages they have over Six Flags, but not have all of this completely in-house. I do think that if I'm an investment banker, that's what I'm spending time trying to talk to Disney management about. I do think there's ways to craft out a middle ground that might make this a more interesting investment while also not giving up on their competitive strengths.
Travis Hoium: Well, the market here today shares are up 8% as we're recording, so we'll see where things go in the future. When we come back, we are going to get some good news for Novo Nordisk. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Novo Nordisk reported earnings as well over the past 12 hours or so, Rachel. This is the area that you follow closely. But as I was looking at this, I was shocked to see Novo Nordisk's stock is down 75% since its peak in 2024. That is just a crazy fall for a company that I think is still very identifiable with this GLP-1 craze. Things are turning around. At least, it seems like the market's thinking, we got a little bit of good news today. What did you see from the results?
Rachel Warren: I think the biggest and most obvious takeaway is the oral version of Wegovy that they are selling is proving to be a major volume engine for the business. This was the first full quarter of the Wegovy being on the U.S. market. It did the equivalent of about 354 million in sales million dollars. [LAUGHTER] I'm translating that from Data Schroeder. But that was essentially double what analysts were expecting. There's this idea that Novo's maybe tapping into a segment of patients that weren't using the injectable version by making the drug a simple pill, lowering the barrier to entry. There. Overall, sales in the quarter jumped about 32% on a constant currency basis, and the Wegovy brand now controls about 65% of all new prescriptions in the US obesity market. They actually elevated their guidance a bit. They're now looking for sales and profits to contract by only 4%-12% instead of 13%. They're still looking at declines.
Travis Hoium: We're seeing more prescriptions but less profit. Does this mean that they're lowering prices? I think this is what we've seen with some of their partnerships. I think, down almost 90% from that $2,000 a month. Yeah. We're going to lower prices, or we're going to make it up in volume? Is that the story?
Rachel Warren: Think that's what they're hoping. They're cutting prices by up to 70% in some channels. You've got list prices that are set to drop another 50% in 2027. But there's something I want to note here. The Wegovy pills require significantly more of the key active ingredient, semaglutide, to be effective compared to an injection. What that means is Novo is using more raw material to make less profit per patient. That is a drag on the margins that doesn't exist for injectable drugs. Of course, they've already been losing ground to the likes of Eli Lilly. With competition of the GLP-1 space. The other point I'll make is they are spending billions on capex to build massive new factories in places like Ireland, like Italy. They're dealing with a very competitive landscape right now. If demand slows down, if the volume drift slows in any way, or you have a better drug from a competitor that hits the market, you've got a major Next Gen GLP-1 from Eli Lilly coming soon. Could they be dealing with very expensive, underutilized infrastructure? That remains to be seen.
Lou Whiteman: The classic thing, Travis. We're making it up on volume. I feel like that meme where, well, it didn't work for these others, but it might work for us comes in here. Look, it's fine and good. I think they are second best right now in their core market right now, for honest, and that's an issue. It's especially an issue because, look, Eli Lilly is investing heavily in what's next. They have done billions in deals this year. I love it when a company takes profits from an existing business and tries to invest in the future with it. We haven't seen that, though. I know they are very high on some parts of their pipeline, since candidates here. But if you dig down, a lot of that pipeline is just different ways to express GLP. Good for them, use this volume and try and invest in going somewhere else. I think that would be my advice for them right now. Just make sure you don't turn out a one-hit wonder in pharmaceuticals, even if it's going well with the way patents work, one-hit wonders tend not to fare too well over time.
Travis Hoium: The clock is ticking. They have about five years left on the patent in the U.S. That patent expired in Canada. Whoops, they forgot to file some paperwork and pay a couple hundred dollars to keep that exclusive in Canada. But yeah, for now, things do seem to be going well, but I agree. You look at Eli Lilly's pipeline and, in particular, Reddit. They've got some other things outside GLP-1s that are really compelling. You're looking at pharmaceutical stocks, despite the fact that there's a bounce today; look at the fact that lowering prices is really what Novo Nordisk is doing.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about in The Motley Fool help may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows t=The Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure. Please check out our show notes. For Lou Whiteman, Rachel Warren, and Dan Boyd behind the glass, I'm Travis Hoium. Thanks for listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. We'll see you here tomorrow.
